These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17976722)

  • 1. Visually guided pointing, the Müller-Lyer illusion, and the functional interpretation of the dorsal-ventral split: conclusions from 33 independent studies.
    Bruno N; Bernardis P; Gentilucci M
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2008; 32(3):423-37. PubMed ID: 17976722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.
    Bruno N; Franz VH
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1421-33. PubMed ID: 19059422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: no shift from dorsal to ventral control.
    Franz VH; Hesse C; Kollath S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1518-31. PubMed ID: 18834894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visuomotor 'immunity' to perceptual illusion: a mismatch of attentional demands cannot explain the perception-action dissociation.
    Dewar MT; Carey DP
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1501-8. PubMed ID: 16364378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A metanalysis of the effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccadic eye movements: no general support for a dissociation of perception and oculomotor action.
    Bruno N; Knox PC; de Grave DD
    Vision Res; 2010 Dec; 50(24):2671-82. PubMed ID: 20858510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Keeping a target in memory does not increase the effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccades.
    de Brouwer AJ; Brenner E; Smeets JB
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 234(4):977-83. PubMed ID: 26686530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional limits and freedom in visually guided action.
    Enns JT; Liu G
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():215-26. PubMed ID: 19733759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Another look at the Müller-Lyer illusion: different gaze patterns in vision for action and perception.
    van Doorn H; van der Kamp J; de Wit M; Savelsbergh GJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):804-12. PubMed ID: 19118565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Delayed pointing movements to masked Müller-Lyer figures are affected by target size but not the illusion.
    de Wit M; van der Kamp J; Masters RS
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1903-9. PubMed ID: 21420989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No evidence for visuomotor priming in a visually guided action task.
    Cant JS; Westwood DA; Valyear KF; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(2):216-26. PubMed ID: 15707906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evolving view of duplex vision: separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action.
    Goodale MA; Westwood DA
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2004 Apr; 14(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15082326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time course of the effect of the Muller-Lyer illusion on saccades and perceptual judgments.
    de Brouwer AJ; Brenner E; Medendorp WP; Smeets JB
    J Vis; 2014 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 24396047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate and delayed reaching in hemispatial neglect.
    Rossit S; Muir K; Reeves I; Duncan G; Birschel P; Harvey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1563-72. PubMed ID: 18771672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Müller-Lyer illusion affects visuomotor updating in the dorsal visual stream.
    de Brouwer AJ; Smeets JB; Gutteling TP; Toni I; Medendorp WP
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Oct; 77():119-27. PubMed ID: 26282275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pointing and antipointing in Müller-Lyer figures: Why illusion effects need to be scaled.
    Hesse C; Franz VH; Schenk T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jan; 42(1):90-102. PubMed ID: 26322691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The neural mechanisms underlying the Müller-Lyer illusion and its interaction with visuospatial judgments.
    Weidner R; Fink GR
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Apr; 17(4):878-84. PubMed ID: 16707733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual illusions affect both movement planning and on-line control: a multiple cue position on bias and goal-directed action.
    Mendoza J; Hansen S; Glazebrook CM; Keetch KM; Elliott D
    Hum Mov Sci; 2005; 24(5-6):760-73. PubMed ID: 16223538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure.
    Westwood DA; McEachern T; Roy EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Nov; 141(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 11713628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When does action resist visual illusion? The effect of Müller-Lyer stimuli on reflexive and voluntary saccades.
    Knox PC; Bruno N
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(2):277-87. PubMed ID: 17372725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.