These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1797702)
1. Hydrocolloid dressing versus tulle gauze in the treatment of abrasions in cyclists. Hermans MH Int J Sports Med; 1991 Dec; 12(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 1797702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial. Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Xakellis GC; Chrischilles EA Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 May; 73(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 1580775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A histological comparison of acute inflammatory responses with a hydrofibre or tulle gauze dressing. Hoekstra MJ; Hermans MH; Richters CD; Dutrieux RP J Wound Care; 2002 Mar; 11(3):113-7. PubMed ID: 11933728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Care of pressure sores: a controlled study of the use of a hydrocolloid dressing compared with wet saline gauze compresses. Alm A; Hornmark AM; Fall PA; Linder L; Bergstrand B; Ehrnebo M; Madsen SM; Setterberg G Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1989; 149():1-10. PubMed ID: 2694713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of hydrocolloid dressings on healing by second intention after excision of pilonidal sinus. Viciano V; Castera JE; Medrano J; Aguiló J; Torro J; Botella MG; Toldrá N Eur J Surg; 2000 Mar; 166(3):229-32. PubMed ID: 10755338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Occlusive dressing versus petroleum gauze on drainage wounds. Alsbjörn BF; Ovesen H; Walther-Larsen S Acta Chir Scand; 1990 Mar; 156(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 2336914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of wound dressings on full-thickness wounds in micropigs. Gokoo C; Burhop K Decubitus; 1993 Sep; 6(5):42-3, 46, 48 passim. PubMed ID: 8286020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomised clinical trial of Hydrofiber dressing with silver versus povidone-iodine gauze in the management of open surgical and traumatic wounds. Jurczak F; Dugré T; Johnstone A; Offori T; Vujovic Z; Hollander D; Int Wound J; 2007 Mar; 4(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 17425549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [New therapeutic strategies for the treatment of difficult wounds]. Onesti MG; Bitonti A; Fino P; Ciotti M; Scuderi N G Chir; 2008 May; 29(5):212-20. PubMed ID: 18507956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison among Op-site, polyvinyl chloride film and tulle gauze in the treatment of skin graft donor sitet. Poonyakariyagorn T; Sirimaharaj W; Pinchai O; Angspatt A J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Apr; 85(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 12118492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of four different dressings on donor site wounds. Beldon P Br J Nurs; 2004 Mar; 13(6 Suppl):S38-45. PubMed ID: 15126974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on hydrocolloid occlusive dressing versus conventional gauze dressing in the healing of chronic wounds. Singh A; Halder S; Menon GR; Chumber S; Misra MC; Sharma LK; Srivastava A Asian J Surg; 2004 Oct; 27(4):326-32. PubMed ID: 15564189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers. Colwell JC; Foreman MD; Trotter JP Decubitus; 1993 Jul; 6(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 8297488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers. Seeley J; Jensen JL; Hutcherson J Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):39-44, 46-7. PubMed ID: 10655861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of cadexomer iodine paste in the treatment of venous leg ulcers compared with hydrocolloid dressing and paraffin gauze dressing. Cadexomer Iodine Study Group. Hansson C Int J Dermatol; 1998 May; 37(5):390-6. PubMed ID: 9620490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective comparison of a new, synthetic donor site dressing versus an impregnated gauze dressing. Hickerson WL; Kealey GP; Smith DJ; Thomson PD J Burn Care Rehabil; 1994; 15(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 7929519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of a hydrocolloid dressing on bacterial growth and the healing process of leg ulcers. Annoni F; Rosina M; Chiurazzi D; Ceva M Int Angiol; 1989; 8(4):224-8. PubMed ID: 2634718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]