344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1797702)
1. Hydrocolloid dressing versus tulle gauze in the treatment of abrasions in cyclists.
Hermans MH
Int J Sports Med; 1991 Dec; 12(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 1797702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Xakellis GC; Chrischilles EA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 May; 73(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 1580775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A histological comparison of acute inflammatory responses with a hydrofibre or tulle gauze dressing.
Hoekstra MJ; Hermans MH; Richters CD; Dutrieux RP
J Wound Care; 2002 Mar; 11(3):113-7. PubMed ID: 11933728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Care of pressure sores: a controlled study of the use of a hydrocolloid dressing compared with wet saline gauze compresses.
Alm A; Hornmark AM; Fall PA; Linder L; Bergstrand B; Ehrnebo M; Madsen SM; Setterberg G
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1989; 149():1-10. PubMed ID: 2694713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of hydrocolloid dressings on healing by second intention after excision of pilonidal sinus.
Viciano V; Castera JE; Medrano J; Aguiló J; Torro J; Botella MG; Toldrá N
Eur J Surg; 2000 Mar; 166(3):229-32. PubMed ID: 10755338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
Chang KW; Alsagoff S; Ong KT; Sim PH
Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Occlusive dressing versus petroleum gauze on drainage wounds.
Alsbjörn BF; Ovesen H; Walther-Larsen S
Acta Chir Scand; 1990 Mar; 156(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 2336914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of wound dressings on full-thickness wounds in micropigs.
Gokoo C; Burhop K
Decubitus; 1993 Sep; 6(5):42-3, 46, 48 passim. PubMed ID: 8286020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomised clinical trial of Hydrofiber dressing with silver versus povidone-iodine gauze in the management of open surgical and traumatic wounds.
Jurczak F; Dugré T; Johnstone A; Offori T; Vujovic Z; Hollander D;
Int Wound J; 2007 Mar; 4(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 17425549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [New therapeutic strategies for the treatment of difficult wounds].
Onesti MG; Bitonti A; Fino P; Ciotti M; Scuderi N
G Chir; 2008 May; 29(5):212-20. PubMed ID: 18507956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison among Op-site, polyvinyl chloride film and tulle gauze in the treatment of skin graft donor sitet.
Poonyakariyagorn T; Sirimaharaj W; Pinchai O; Angspatt A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Apr; 85(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 12118492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of four different dressings on donor site wounds.
Beldon P
Br J Nurs; 2004 Mar; 13(6 Suppl):S38-45. PubMed ID: 15126974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on hydrocolloid occlusive dressing versus conventional gauze dressing in the healing of chronic wounds.
Singh A; Halder S; Menon GR; Chumber S; Misra MC; Sharma LK; Srivastava A
Asian J Surg; 2004 Oct; 27(4):326-32. PubMed ID: 15564189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.
Colwell JC; Foreman MD; Trotter JP
Decubitus; 1993 Jul; 6(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 8297488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers.
Seeley J; Jensen JL; Hutcherson J
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):39-44, 46-7. PubMed ID: 10655861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of cadexomer iodine paste in the treatment of venous leg ulcers compared with hydrocolloid dressing and paraffin gauze dressing. Cadexomer Iodine Study Group.
Hansson C
Int J Dermatol; 1998 May; 37(5):390-6. PubMed ID: 9620490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Management of radiation-induced moist skin desquamation using hydrocolloid dressing.
Margolin SG; Breneman JC; Denman DL; LaChapelle P; Weckbach L; Aron BS
Cancer Nurs; 1990 Apr; 13(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 2331694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective comparison of a new, synthetic donor site dressing versus an impregnated gauze dressing.
Hickerson WL; Kealey GP; Smith DJ; Thomson PD
J Burn Care Rehabil; 1994; 15(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 7929519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of a hydrocolloid dressing on bacterial growth and the healing process of leg ulcers.
Annoni F; Rosina M; Chiurazzi D; Ceva M
Int Angiol; 1989; 8(4):224-8. PubMed ID: 2634718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
