These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17978434)

  • 41. Can a wastewater treatment plant be a powerplant? A case study.
    Schwarzenbeck N; Pfeiffer W; Bomball E
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1555-61. PubMed ID: 18520012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Benchmark simulation Model no 2 in Matlab-simulink: towards plant-wide WWTP control strategy evaluation.
    Vreck D; Gernaey KV; Rosen C; Jeppsson U
    Water Sci Technol; 2006; 54(8):65-72. PubMed ID: 17163014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A new one-dimensional clarifier model--verification using full-scale experimental data.
    De Clercq J; Devisscher M; Boonen I; Vanrolleghem PA; Defrancq J
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):105-12. PubMed ID: 12926676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Analysing sludge balance in activated sludge systems with a novel mass transport model.
    Patziger M; Kainz H; Hunze M; Józsa J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(9):1413-9. PubMed ID: 18496007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of several respirometry-based activated sludge toxicity control strategies.
    Ko J; Woo H; Copp JB; Kim S; Kim C
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(4-5):143-50. PubMed ID: 11936627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A guideline for simulation studies of wastewater treatment plants.
    Langergraber G; Rieger L; Winkler S; Alex J; Wiese J; Owerdieck C; Ahnert M; Simon J; Maurer M
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):131-8. PubMed ID: 15553468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Performance evaluation of fault detection methods for wastewater treatment processes.
    Corominas L; Villez K; Aguado D; Rieger L; Rosén C; Vanrolleghem PA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2011 Feb; 108(2):333-44. PubMed ID: 20882518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Benchmarking of municipal waste water treatment plants (an Austrian project).
    Lindtner S; Kroiss H; Nowak O
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):265-71. PubMed ID: 15553485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Design and analysis of a solar reactor for anaerobic wastewater treatment.
    Yiannopoulos ACh; Manariotis ID; Chrysikopoulos CV
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Nov; 99(16):7742-9. PubMed ID: 18328695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy modelling of anaerobic digestion of primary sedimentation sludge.
    Cakmakci M
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2007 Sep; 30(5):349-57. PubMed ID: 17593401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An integrated modelling concept for immission-based management of sewer system, wastewater treatment plant and river.
    Erbe V; Schütze M
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(5):95-103. PubMed ID: 16248185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of different operational modes of a two-stage activated sludge pilot plant for the extension of the Vienna STP.
    Müller-Rechberger H; Wandl G; Winkler S; Svardal K; Matsché N
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 11496664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effects of ionic strength and ion pairing on (plant-wide) modelling of anaerobic digestion.
    Solon K; Flores-Alsina X; Mbamba CK; Volcke EI; Tait S; Batstone D; Gernaey KV; Jeppsson U
    Water Res; 2015 Mar; 70():235-45. PubMed ID: 25540837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Modification of Activated Sludge Model no. 3 considering direct growth on primary substrate.
    Karahan-Gül O; van Loosdrecht MC; Orhon D
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):219-25. PubMed ID: 12906293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Application of the IWA ADM1 model to simulate anaerobic co-digestion of organic waste with waste activated sludge in mesophilic condition.
    Derbal K; Bencheikh-Lehocine M; Cecchi F; Meniai AH; Pavan P
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Feb; 100(4):1539-43. PubMed ID: 18954973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Implementation of storage tanks on the COST 624 benchmark.
    Pons MN; Corriou JP
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(4-5):159-66. PubMed ID: 11936629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A new concept for storm water treatment: full-scale experience in Flanders.
    Carrette R; Thoeye C; Ockier P
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(1):195-9. PubMed ID: 11496673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Modeling of two-phase anaerobic process treating traditional Chinese medicine wastewater with the IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1.
    Chen Z; Hu D; Zhang Z; Ren N; Zhu H
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Oct; 100(20):4623-31. PubMed ID: 19477121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Modeling of a reactive primary clarifier.
    Gernaey K; Vanrolleghem PA; Lessard P
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):73-81. PubMed ID: 11385877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Data evaluation of full-scale wastewater treatment plants by mass balance.
    Puig S; van Loosdrecht MC; Colprim J; Meijer SC
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(18):4645-55. PubMed ID: 18786694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.