147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17978436)
1. Comparing global sensitivity analysis for a biofilm model for two-step nitrification using the qualitative screening method of Morris or the quantitative variance-based Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST).
Brockmann D; Morgenroth E
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):85-93. PubMed ID: 17978436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nitrification modelling in biofilms under inhibitory conditions.
Gheewala SH; Pole RK; Annachhatre AP
Water Res; 2004; 38(14-15):3179-88. PubMed ID: 15276733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Practical identifiability of biokinetic parameters of a model describing two-step nitrification in biofilms.
Brockmann D; Rosenwinkel KH; Morgenroth E
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Oct; 101(3):497-514. PubMed ID: 18512262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simulation of biofilm growth, substrate conversion and mass transfer under different hydrodynamic conditions.
Horn H; Wäsche S; Hempel DC
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(1-2):249-52. PubMed ID: 12216631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Kinetics of biodegradation of phenolic wastewater in a biofilm reactor.
Lin YH; Hsien TY
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(9):1703-11. PubMed ID: 19448304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Introduction to the IWA task group on biofilm modeling.
Noguera DR; Morgenroth E
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(11-12):131-6. PubMed ID: 15303733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved computational model (AQUIFAS) for activated sludge, integrated fixed-film activated sludge, and moving-bed biofilm reactor systems, Part I: Semi-empirical model development.
Sen D; Randall CW
Water Environ Res; 2008 May; 80(5):439-53. PubMed ID: 18605383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simplified and Monod kinetics in one-dimensional biofilm reactor modelling: a comparison.
Bonomo L; Pastorelli G; Quinto E
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(1):295-302. PubMed ID: 11379104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating trends in biofilm density using the UMCCA model.
Laspidou CS; Rittmann BE
Water Res; 2004; 38(14-15):3362-72. PubMed ID: 15276753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the QUESTOR water quality model using a Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST) for two UK rivers.
Deflandre A; Williams RJ; Elorza FJ; Mira J; Boorman DB
Sci Total Environ; 2006 May; 360(1-3):290-304. PubMed ID: 16219341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating operating conditions for outcompeting nitrite oxidizers and maintaining partial nitrification in biofilm systems using biofilm modeling and Monte Carlo filtering.
Brockmann D; Morgenroth E
Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(6):1995-2009. PubMed ID: 20044119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomass concentration and biofilm characteristics in high-performance fluidized-bed biofilm reactors.
Rabah FK; Dahab MF; Surampalli RY
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):579-86. PubMed ID: 16459836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation and recommendation of sensitivity analysis methods for application to Stochastic Human Exposure and Dose Simulation models.
Mokhtari A; Christopher Frey H; Zheng J
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 16(6):491-506. PubMed ID: 16519411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-dimensional cellular automaton model for mixed-culture biofilm.
Pizarro GE; García C; Moreno R; Sepúlveda ME
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(11-12):193-8. PubMed ID: 15303741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing biofilm models for a single species biofilm system.
Morgenroth E; Eberl HJ; van Loosdrecht MC; Noguera DR; Pizarro GE; Picioreanu C; Rittmann BE; Schwarz AO; Wanner O
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(11-12):145-54. PubMed ID: 15303735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A simplified model for the steady-state biofilm-activated sludge reactor.
Fouad M; Bhargava R
J Environ Manage; 2005 Feb; 74(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 15644264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The characteristics of the biofilm fixed inside porous medium by sequencing batch reactor.
Hoshi K; Deguchi H
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(1-2):261-5. PubMed ID: 12216634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental results and mathematical modelling of an autotrophic and heterotrophic biofilm in a sand filter treating landfill leachate and municipal wastewater.
Wichern M; Lindenblatt C; Lübken M; Horn H
Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):3899-909. PubMed ID: 18708239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of DO concentration on biofilm structure and membrane filterability in submerged membrane bioreactor.
Jin YL; Lee WN; Lee CH; Chang IS; Huang X; Swaminathan T
Water Res; 2006 Aug; 40(15):2829-36. PubMed ID: 16859730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nitritation performance and biofilm development of co- and counter-diffusion biofilm reactors: modeling and experimental comparison.
Wang R; Terada A; Lackner S; Smets BF; Henze M; Xia S; Zhao J
Water Res; 2009 Jun; 43(10):2699-709. PubMed ID: 19375773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
