These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17978655)

  • 1. Reproducibility of measuring the shape and three-dimensional position of cervical vertebrae in upright position using the EOS stereoradiography system.
    Rousseau MA; Laporte S; Chavary-Bernier E; Lazennec JY; Skalli W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2569-72. PubMed ID: 17978655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography.
    Glaser DA; Doan J; Newton PO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):1391-7. PubMed ID: 22415001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional assessment of the intervertebral kinematics after Mobi-C total disc replacement at the cervical spine in vivo using the EOS stereoradiography system.
    Rousseau MA; Laporte S; Dufour T; Steib JP; Lazennec JY; Skalli W
    SAS J; 2011; 5(3):63-8. PubMed ID: 25802670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shoulder bony landmarks location using the EOS low-dose stereoradiography system: a reproducibility study.
    Ohl X; Stanchina C; Billuart F; Skalli W
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2010 Feb; 32(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 19806289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the relative 3D orientation of vertebrae reconstructed by bi-planar radiography.
    Dumas R; Le Bras A; Champain N; Savidan M; Mitton D; Kalifa G; Steib JP; de Guise JA; Skalli W
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 Jun; 26(5):415-22. PubMed ID: 15147749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The correlation between surface measurement of head and neck posture and the anatomic position of the upper cervical vertebrae.
    Johnson GM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Apr; 23(8):921-7. PubMed ID: 9580960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional imaging of the spine using the EOS system: is it reliable? A comparative study using computed tomography imaging.
    Al-Aubaidi Z; Lebel D; Oudjhane K; Zeller R
    J Pediatr Orthop B; 2013 Sep; 22(5):409-12. PubMed ID: 23652967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical vertebrae maturation method morphologic criteria: poor reproducibility.
    Nestman TS; Marshall SD; Qian F; Holton N; Franciscus RG; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 21803255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability of cervical spine measurements.
    Wellborn CC; Sturm PF; Hatch RS; Bomze SR; Jablonski K
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2000; 20(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 10641692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement variability in the assessment of sagittal alignment of the cervical spine: a comparison of the gore and cobb methods.
    Silber JS; Lipetz JS; Hayes VM; Lonner BS
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2004 Aug; 17(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 15280759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of maximum canal compromise and spinal cord compression for evaluation of acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.
    Fehlings MG; Furlan JC; Massicotte EM; Arnold P; Aarabi B; Harrop J; Anderson DG; Bono CM; Dvorak M; Fisher C; France J; Hedlund R; Madrazo I; Nockels R; Rampersaud R; Rechtine G; Vaccaro AR;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(15):1719-25. PubMed ID: 16816769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of lateral bending and axial rotation with validity of a new method to determine axial rotation on anteroposterior cervical radiographs.
    Janik T; Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Holland B; Coleman RR; Payne MR
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Sep; 24(7):445-8. PubMed ID: 11562652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The assessment of cervical foramina with oblique radiographs: the effect of film angle on foraminal area.
    Simpson AK; Sabino J; Whang P; Emerson JW; Grauer JN
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Feb; 22(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19190430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing 3D paediatric foot morphology using low-dose biplanar radiography: Parameter reproducibility and preliminary values.
    Rampal V; Rohan PY; Saksik R; Wicart P; Skalli W
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Nov; 104(7):1083-1089. PubMed ID: 30253989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EOS analysis of lower extremity segmental torsion in children and young adults.
    Gaumétou E; Quijano S; Ilharreborde B; Presedo A; Thoreux P; Mazda K; Skalli W
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Feb; 100(1):147-51. PubMed ID: 24439563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Defining radiographic criteria for flexion-extension studies of the cervical spine.
    Knopp R; Parker J; Tashjian J; Ganz W
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Jul; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11423809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D reconstruction method from biplanar radiography using non-stereocorresponding points and elastic deformable meshes.
    Mitton D; Landry C; Véron S; Skalli W; Lavaste F; De Guise JA
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2000 Mar; 38(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10829404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A radiolucent chair for sitting-posture radiographs in non-ambulatory children: use in biplanar digital slot-scanning.
    Bouloussa H; Dubory A; Seiler C; Morel B; Bachy M; Vialle R
    Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Nov; 45(12):1864-9. PubMed ID: 26111869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3D detailed reconstruction of vertebrae with low dose digital stereoradiography.
    Le Bras A; Laporte S; Mitton D; de Guise JA; Skalli W
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():286-90. PubMed ID: 15457739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fast accurate stereoradiographic 3D-reconstruction of the spine using a combined geometric and statistic model.
    Pomero V; Mitton D; Laporte S; de Guise JA; Skalli W
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Mar; 19(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 15003338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.