These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17978948)

  • 1. Characteristics of normal newborn transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions: ear asymmetries and sex effects.
    Berninger E
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Nov; 46(11):661-9. PubMed ID: 17978948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emission levels with negative tympanometric peak pressure in infants and toddlers.
    Prieve BA; Calandruccio L; Fitzgerald T; Mazevski A; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 18469719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in the first month of life.
    Prieve BA; Hancur-Bucci CA; Preston JL
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):330-9. PubMed ID: 19322090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationships between otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses in neonates and young children: a correlation and factor analytical study.
    Cacace AT; Pinheiro JM
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Jan; 112(1):156-67. PubMed ID: 11802056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Otoacoustic emissions in neonates measured with different acquisition protocols.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Hatzopoulos S; Sliwa L; Pilka E; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Mar; 76(3):382-7. PubMed ID: 22266169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test-retest reliability of wideband reflectance measures in infants under screening and diagnostic test conditions.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):669-81. PubMed ID: 17804981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response.
    Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Ho GM; Fu TY; Bruna S; Lin G
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maturation of the auditory system: 1. Transient otoacoustic emissions as an index of inner ear maturation.
    Gkoritsa E; Korres S; Psarommatis I; Tsakanikos M; Apostolopoulos N; Ferekidis E
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jun; 46(6):271-6. PubMed ID: 17530511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test-retest reliability of the acoustic stapedial reflex test in healthy neonates.
    Mazlan R; Kei J; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 19322092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital subtraction method for transient evoked otoacoustic emission recording with ipsilateral noise suppression: an application to stimulus artifact reduction.
    Arslan RB; Ozdamar O; Ulgen Y
    Audiology; 2001; 40(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 11409763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of very low birth weight on otoacoustic emissions.
    Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Gkoritsa E; Kandiloros D; Korres GS; Ferekidis E
    B-ENT; 2007; 3(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 17451121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimizing otoacoustic emission protocols for a UNHS program.
    Hatzopoulos S; Petruccelli J; Ciorba A; Martini A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 18663294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of automated auditory brainstem responses and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions for universal newborn hearing screening.
    Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Lyra C; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E
    Med Sci Monit; 2006 Jun; 12(6):CR260-3. PubMed ID: 16733484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcome of a universal newborn hearing-screening programme based on multiple transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and clinical brainstem response audiometry.
    Berninger E; Westling B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jul; 131(7):728-39. PubMed ID: 21466262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of the number of averaged responses on the measurement of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborns.
    Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Nikolopoulos T; Korres GS; Economou NC; Ferekidis E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Mar; 70(3):429-33. PubMed ID: 16140396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Meier S; Narabayashi O; Probst R; Schmuziger N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 15183584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Otoacoustic emissions for newborn hearing screening].
    Liao H; Wu Z; Zhou T
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Feb; 34(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 12764789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response.
    Suppiej A; Rizzardi E; Zanardo V; Franzoi M; Ermani M; Orzan E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 17317296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in new-borns: normative data.
    Paludetti G; Ottaviani F; Fetoni AR; Zuppa AA; Tortorolo G
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1999 Mar; 47(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 10321778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.