BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17978995)

  • 1. Physical design analysis and mainstream smoke constituent yields of the new potential reduced exposure product, Marlboro UltraSmooth.
    Rees VW; Wayne GF; Thomas BF; Connolly GN
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2007 Nov; 9(11):1197-206. PubMed ID: 17978995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Puffing style and human exposure minimally altered by switching to a carbon-filtered cigarette.
    Rees VW; Wayne GF; Connolly GN
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Nov; 17(11):2995-3003. PubMed ID: 18990741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mainstream smoke constituent yields and predicting relationships from a worldwide market sample of cigarette brands: ISO smoking conditions.
    Counts ME; Hsu FS; Laffoon SW; Dwyer RW; Cox RH
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Apr; 39(2):111-34. PubMed ID: 15041144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of tobacco ingredients on smoke chemistry. Part I: Flavourings and additives.
    Baker RR; Pereira da Silva JR; Smith G
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2004; 42 Suppl():S3-37. PubMed ID: 15072836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marlboro UltraSmooth: a potentially reduced exposure cigarette?
    Laugesen M; Fowles J
    Tob Control; 2006 Dec; 15(6):430-5. PubMed ID: 17130370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chemical and biological studies of a new cigarette that primarily heats tobacco. Part 1. Chemical composition of mainstream smoke.
    Borgerding MF; Bodnar JA; Chung HL; Mangan PP; Morrison CC; Risner CH; Rogers JC; Simmons DF; Uhrig MS; Wendelboe FN; Wingate DE; Winkler LS
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1998 Jul; 36(7):169-82. PubMed ID: 9687969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chemical and biological studies of a new cigarette that primarily heats tobacco. Part 1. Chemical composition of mainstream smoke.
    Borgerding MF; Bodnar JA; Chung HL; Mangan PP; Morrison CC; Risner CH; Rogers JC; Simmons DF; Uhrig MS; Wendelboe FN; Wingate DE; Winkler LS
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1998 Mar; 36(3):169-82. PubMed ID: 9609390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tobacco smoke: unraveling a controversial subject.
    Thielen A; Klus H; Müller L
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2008 Jun; 60(2-3):141-56. PubMed ID: 18485684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some consequences of using cigarette machine smoking regimes with different intensities on smoke yields and their variability.
    Purkis SW; Cahours X; Rey M; Teillet B; Troude V; Verron T
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Mar; 59(2):293-309. PubMed ID: 21074590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The generation of formaldehyde in cigarettes--Overview and recent experiments.
    Baker RR
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2006 Nov; 44(11):1799-822. PubMed ID: 16859820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Smoke composition and predicting relationships for international commercial cigarettes smoked with three machine-smoking conditions.
    Counts ME; Morton MJ; Laffoon SW; Cox RH; Lipowicz PJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Apr; 41(3):185-227. PubMed ID: 15748796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scope for regulation of cigarette smoke toxicity: the case for including charcoal filters.
    Laugesen M; Fowles J
    N Z Med J; 2005 Apr; 118(1213):U1402. PubMed ID: 15843831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Could charcoal filtration of cigarette smoke reduce smoking-induced disease? A review of the literature.
    Coggins CR; Gaworski CL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Apr; 50(3):359-65. PubMed ID: 18289753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scope for regulation of cigarette smoke toxicity according to brand differences in published toxicant emissions.
    Laugesen M; Fowles J
    N Z Med J; 2005 Apr; 118(1213):U1401. PubMed ID: 15843830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of functional relationships for predicting mainstream smoke constituent machine yields for conventional cigarettes from the Japanese market.
    Hyodo T; Maruta Y; Itaya H; Mikita A; Kodera T; Meger M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 48(2):194-224. PubMed ID: 17502123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of mouth level exposure to smoke constituents of cigarettes with different tar levels using filter analysis.
    Hyodo T; Minagawa K; Inoue T; Fujimoto J; Minami N; Bito R; Mikita A
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):486-98. PubMed ID: 24113618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mainstream smoke emissions of Australian and Canadian cigarettes.
    King B; Borland R; Fowles J
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2007 Aug; 9(8):835-44. PubMed ID: 17654296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of cigarette menthol content on mainstream smoke emissions.
    Gordon SM; Brinkman MC; Meng RQ; Anderson GM; Chuang JC; Kroeger RR; Reyes IL; Clark PI
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2011 Oct; 24(10):1744-53. PubMed ID: 21888394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of filtration by activated charcoal on the toxicological activity of cigarette mainstream smoke from experimental cigarettes.
    Gaworski CL; Schramke H; Diekmann J; Meisgen TJ; Tewes FJ; Veltel DJ; Vanscheeuwijck PM; Rajendran N; Muzzio M; Haussmann HJ
    Inhal Toxicol; 2009 Jul; 21(8):688-704. PubMed ID: 19555222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limitations in the characterisation of cigarette products using different machine smoking regimes.
    Purkis SW; Troude V; Duputié G; Tessier C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 58(3):501-15. PubMed ID: 20807558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.