368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17979012)
1. Successful prosthetic fitting of elderly trans-femoral amputees with Intelligent Prosthesis (IP): a clinical pilot study.
Chin T; Maeda Y; Sawamura S; Oyabu H; Nagakura Y; Takase I; Machida K
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Sep; 31(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 17979012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Energy cost during ambulation in transfemoral amputees: a knee joint with a mechanical swing phase control vs a knee joint with a pneumatic swing phase control.
Boonstra AM; Schrama J; Fidler V; Eisma WH
Scand J Rehabil Med; 1995 Jun; 27(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 7569824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mobility function of a prosthetic knee joint with an automatic stance phase lock.
Andrysek J; Klejman S; Torres-Moreno R; Heim W; Steinnagel B; Glasford S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 21697198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does having a computerized prosthetic knee influence cognitive performance during amputee walking?
Williams RM; Turner AP; Orendurff M; Segal AD; Klute GK; Pecoraro J; Czerniecki J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jul; 87(7):989-94. PubMed ID: 16813788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Functional gait analysis of trans-femoral amputees using two different single-axis prosthetic knees with hydraulic swing-phase control: Kinematic and kinetic comparison of two prosthetic knees.
Sapin E; Goujon H; de Almeida F; Fodé P; Lavaste F
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Jun; 32(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 18569888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of different microprocessor controlled knee joints on the energy consumption during walking in trans-femoral amputees: intelligent knee prosthesis (IP) versus C-leg.
Chin T; Machida K; Sawamura S; Shiba R; Oyabu H; Nagakura Y; Takase I; Nakagawa A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Apr; 30(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 16739783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Uphill and downhill walking in unilateral lower limb amputees.
Vrieling AH; van Keeken HG; Schoppen T; Otten E; Halbertsma JP; Hof AL; Postema K
Gait Posture; 2008 Aug; 28(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 18242995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Biomechanics and evaluation of the microprocessor-controlled C-Leg exoprosthesis knee joint].
Stinus H
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2000; 138(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 10929622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of oxygen consumption for conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in transfemoral amputees.
Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J
Clin Rehabil; 2008; 22(10-11):896-901. PubMed ID: 18955421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Compensatory mechanism involving the hip joint of the intact limb during gait in unilateral trans-tibial amputees.
Grumillier C; Martinet N; Paysant J; André JM; Beyaert C
J Biomech; 2008 Oct; 41(14):2926-31. PubMed ID: 18771768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conventional versus microchip controlled pneumatic swing phase control for trans-femoral amputees: user's verdict.
Datta D; Howitt J
Prosthet Orthot Int; 1998 Aug; 22(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 9747997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Energy expenditure during walking in amputees after disarticulation of the hip. A microprocessor-controlled swing-phase control knee versus a mechanical-controlled stance-phase control knee.
Chin T; Sawamura S; Shiba R; Oyabu H; Nagakura Y; Nakagawa A
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Jan; 87(1):117-9. PubMed ID: 15686251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of an Intelligent Prosthesis (IP) on the walking ability of young transfemoral amputees: comparison of IP users with able-bodied people.
Chin T; Sawamura S; Shiba R; Oyabu H; Nagakura Y; Takase I; Machida K; Nakagawa A
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Jun; 82(6):447-51. PubMed ID: 12820787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of the prosthetic knee.
Hafner BJ; Willingham LL; Buell NC; Allyn KJ; Smith DG
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 17270519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The efficacy of physiological cost index (PCI) measurement of a subject walking with an Intelligent Prosthesis.
Chin T; Sawamura S; Fujita H; Nakajima S; Ojima I; Oyabu H; Nagakura Y; Otsuka H; Nakagawa A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Apr; 23(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 10355642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short-term effect of physiotherapy rehabilitation on functional performance of lower limb amputees.
Rau B; Bonvin F; de Bie R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Sep; 31(3):258-70. PubMed ID: 17979011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Design and quantitative evaluation of a stance-phase controlled prosthetic knee joint for children.
Andrysek J; Naumann S; Cleghorn WL
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Dec; 13(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 16425824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Energy expenditure during ambulation in dysvascular and traumatic below-knee amputees: a comparison of five prosthetic feet.
Torburn L; Powers CM; Guiterrez R; Perry J
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1995 May; 32(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 7562650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D intersegmental knee loading in below-knee amputees across steady-state walking speeds.
Fey NP; Neptune RR
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 May; 27(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 22138437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative evaluation of oxygen consumption and gait pattern in amputees using Intelligent Prostheses and conventionally damped knee swing-phase control.
Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J
Clin Rehabil; 2005 Jun; 19(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 15929508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
