513 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17980332)
1. An evaluation of the resident learning curve in performing laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies as compared with patient outcome: five-year experience.
Ascher-Walsh CJ; Capes T
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 17980332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of lightly embalmed (fresh tissue) cadavers for resident laparoscopic training.
Levine RL; Kives S; Cathey G; Blinchevsky A; Acland R; Thompson C; Pasic R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(5):451-6. PubMed ID: 16962531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation: initial experience.
Rosenblatt P; Makai G; DiSciullo A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 20417424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.
Sarmini OR; Lefholz K; Froeschke HP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 15904614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies.
Hur HC; Guido RS; Mansuria SM; Hacker MR; Sanfilippo JS; Lee TT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 17478361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intramyometrial injection of vasopressin in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.
Ghomi A; Makhlouf F; Kasturi S; Einarsson JI
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 18312990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative complication rate in 1706 patients after a standardized laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy technique.
Bojahr B; Raatz D; Schonleber G; Abri C; Ohlinger R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 16698522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a comparative study.
Vaisbuch E; Goldchmit C; Ofer D; Agmon A; Hagay Z
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jun; 126(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 16616408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic Pomeroy tubal ligation as a teaching model for residents.
Fox MD; Long CA; Meeks GR; Jutras ML; Cowan BD
J Reprod Med; 1994 Nov; 39(11):862-4. PubMed ID: 7853274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy in a community hospital. A cost comparison.
Simon NV; Laveran RL; Cavanaugh S; Gerlach DH; Jackson JR
J Reprod Med; 1999 Apr; 44(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 10319303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Residents' learning experience.
Yeko TR; Villa A; Parsons AK; Maroulis GB
J Reprod Med; 1994 Nov; 39(11):854-6. PubMed ID: 7853272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Individual physician experience with laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy in a single outpatient setting.
McClellan SN; Hamilton B; Rettenmaier MA; Lopez K; John CR; Hu JC; Goldstein BH
Surg Innov; 2007 Jun; 14(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 17558015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital. Decreasing the need for abdominal hysterectomy and increasing resident experience in vaginal surgery.
Fylstra DL; Carter JF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 8829062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outpatient laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with assistance of the lap loop.
Lieng M; Istre O; Langebrekke A; Jungersen M; Busund B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 15922989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes.
Fiorentino RP; Zepeda MA; Goldstein BH; John CR; Rettenmaier MA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16431325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of resident and attending surgeon seniority on operative performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Kauvar DS; Braswell A; Brown BD; Harnisch M
J Surg Res; 2006 May; 132(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 16412471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a novel method with a wound retractor and a glove.
Lee YY; Kim TJ; Kim CJ; Kang H; Choi CH; Lee JW; Kim BG; Lee JH; Bae DS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(4):450-3. PubMed ID: 19487164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]