147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17980333)
1. Why has the acceptance of laparoscopic hysterectomy been slow? Results of an anonymous survey of Australian gynecologists.
Englund M; Robson S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):724-8. PubMed ID: 17980333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive hysterectomies-a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists.
Einarsson JI; Matteson KA; Schulkin J; Chavan NR; Sangi-Haghpeykar H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 20226403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gynecologists' characteristics associated with the likelihood of performing laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy: a nationwide population-based study.
Huang CC; Wu MP; Huang YT
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Apr; 161(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 22300773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic training and practice in gynecologic oncology among Society of Gynecologic Oncologists members and fellows-in-training.
Frumovitz M; Ramirez PT; Greer M; Gregurich MA; Wolf J; Bodurka DC; Levenback C
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Sep; 94(3):746-53. PubMed ID: 15350368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attitudes to mode of hysterectomy--a survey-based study among Swedish gynecologists.
Persson P; Hellborg T; Brynhildsen J; Fredrikson M; Kjølhede P
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 19241224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Canadian hysterectomy educational experience: survey of recent graduates in obstetrics and gynecology.
Kroft J; Moody JR; Lee P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 21570363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: eliciting preference of performers and colleagues via conjoint analysis.
Twijnstra AR; Stiggelbout AM; de Kroon CD; Jansen FW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 21803663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Innovations in surgery: the role of residents in the implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Pijnenborg JM; ter Haar JF
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011 Sep; 21(7):615-9. PubMed ID: 21612451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The care of adolescents by obstetrician-gynecologists: a first look.
Goldstein LS; Chapin JL; Lara-Torre E; Schulkin J
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 22(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 19345918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attitudes toward mode of hysterectomy: a survey-based study among German gynecologists.
David M; Wild D; Wernecke KD; Siedentopf F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Oct; 164(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 22765973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gynecologists' attitudes toward hysterectomy: is the sex of the clinician a factor?
Brummitt K; Harmanli OH; Gaughan J; Dandolu V; Chatwani AJ; Hernandez E
J Reprod Med; 2006 Jan; 51(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 16482772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changing hysterectomy technique from open abdominal to laparoscopic: new trend in Oslo, Norway.
Istre O; Langebrekke A; Qvigstad E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 17218234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Operative laparoscopy in The Netherlands: Diffusion and acceptance.
Kolkman W; Trimbos-Kemper TC; Jansen FW
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Feb; 130(2):245-8. PubMed ID: 16650922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minilaparotomy hysterectomy assisted by self-retaining elastic abdominal retractor.
Alcalde JL; Guiloff E; Ricci P; Solà V; Pardo J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 17218240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. National learning curve for laparoscopic hysterectomy and trends in hysterectomy in Finland 2000-2005.
Brummer TH; Seppälä TT; Härkki PS
Hum Reprod; 2008 Apr; 23(4):840-5. PubMed ID: 18238905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the different types of "laparoscopic total hysterectomy".
Leung SW; Chan CS; Lo SF; Pang CP; Pun TC; Yuen PM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 17218237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of physician gender and specialty on utilization of hysterectomy in New York, 2001-2005.
Gretz H; Bradley WH; Zakashansky K; Nezhat F; Bohren DL; Kreiger K; Rubin E; Sokolow A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):347.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18639208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical relevance of conversion rate and its evaluation in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Twijnstra AR; Blikkendaal MD; van Zwet EW; Jansen FW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 23312244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted hysterectomies with conventional hysterectomies.
Abdollahi SF; Bahlouli A; Mostafa PG; Rasooli S; Morteza G
Saudi Med J; 2009 Jun; 30(6):813-6. PubMed ID: 19526166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
