BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17980930)

  • 21. Case mix measures and diagnosis-related groups: opportunities and threats for inpatient dermatology.
    Hensen P; Fürstenberg T; Luger TA; Steinhoff M; Roeder N
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2005 Sep; 19(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 16164713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The performance of Australian DRGs.
    Reid B; Palmer G; Aisbett C
    Aust Health Rev; 2000; 23(2):20-31. PubMed ID: 11010575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Ordinary hospitalisation, day surgery and one-day surgery: appropriateness and economic considerations in the DRG era].
    Porcellini A; Ventura P; Federico L
    Chir Ital; 2007; 59(4):461-6. PubMed ID: 17966765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The ICD9-ICD9 CM coding system: what is the variance of DRG classification in cardiology?].
    Tasso S
    G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 27(11):1175-80. PubMed ID: 9463062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. DRGs as management information or reimbursement method.
    Sheill A
    Aust Health Rev; 1993; 16(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 10129458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Revising diagnosis-related groups for neonates.
    Lichtig LK; Knauf RA; Bartoletti A; Wozniak LM; Gregg RH; Muldoon J; Ellis WC
    Pediatrics; 1989 Jul; 84(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 2500638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patient classification and hospital costs of care for acute myocardial infarction in nine European countries.
    Häkkinen U; Chiarello P; Cots F; Peltola M; Rättö H;
    Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():19-29. PubMed ID: 22815109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Distinguishing between tertiary and secondary facilities: a case study of cardiac diagnostic-related groups (DRGs).
    Rouse P; Arulambalam A; Correa R; Ullman C
    N Z Med J; 2010 May; 123(1314):49-54. PubMed ID: 20581912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Assesing the GRDOSIS Software program as a tool to analyse drug usase by DRGs].
    Alerany Pardo C; Blanco Serrano B; Estaún Díaz E; López Briz E; Monterde Junyent J; Montero Pardillo M; Montojo Guillén C; Montoro Ronsano JB; Moriel Sánchez MC; Napal Lecumberri V; Vilaseca Tomás A
    Farm Hosp; 2003; 27(3):150-8. PubMed ID: 12835816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Small area variation analysis. Methods for comparing several diagnosis-related groups.
    Diehr P; Cain K; Ye Z; Abdul-Salam F
    Med Care; 1993 May; 31(5 Suppl):YS45-53. PubMed ID: 8492585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimating the costs of drug-related hospital separations in Australia.
    Riddell S; Shanahan M; Degenhardt L; Roxburgh A
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2008 Apr; 32(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 18412687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Casemix in the Islamic Republic of Iran: current knowledge and attitudes of health care staff.
    Ghaffari S; Doran CM; Wilson A
    East Mediterr Health J; 2008; 14(4):931-40. PubMed ID: 19166177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of cost accounting methods from different DRG systems and their effect on health care quality.
    Leister JE; Stausberg J
    Health Policy; 2005 Sep; 74(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 16098411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Application of the new coding standards for introducing diagnosis related groups (DRGs) in ophthalmology].
    Stiefelmeyer S; Neubauer AS; Ehrt O; Kampik A
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Aug; 219(8):584-9. PubMed ID: 12353175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Clinical and economic analysis of an internal medicine-infectious disease department at a university general hospital (2005-2006)].
    Gómez J; García-Vázquez E; Antonio Puertas J; Ródenas J; Herrero JA; Albaladejo C; Baños V; Canteras M; Alcaraz M
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2009 Feb; 27(2):70-4. PubMed ID: 19254637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speaking the same language: underestimating financial impact when using diagnosis-related group versus ICD-9-based definitions for trauma inclusion criteria.
    Deppe S; Truax CB; Opalek JM; Santanello SA
    J Trauma; 2009 Apr; 66(4):1184-8. PubMed ID: 19359935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Diseases of the digestive system and a system for patient classification: diagnostic-related groups (DRG)].
    Poves Martínez E
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1996 Oct; 88(10):677-86. PubMed ID: 8983307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On the use of administrative databases to support planning activities: the case of the evaluation of neonatal case-mix in the Emilia-Romagna region using DRG and APR-DRG classification systems.
    Fantini MP; Cisbani L; Manzoli L; Vertrees J; Lorenzoni L
    Eur J Public Health; 2003 Jun; 13(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 12803412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Performance of 10 European DRG systems in explaining variation in resource utilisation in inguinal hernia repair.
    O'Reilly J; Serdén L; Talbäck M; McCarthy B;
    Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():89-101. PubMed ID: 22815115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Applications of statistical process control in health care.
    Atkinson S
    Manag Care Q; 1994; 2(3):57-69. PubMed ID: 10136811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.