1759 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17981098)
1. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Craniocervical fixation with occipital condyle screws: biomechanical analysis of a novel technique.
Uribe JS; Ramos E; Youssef AS; Levine N; Turner AW; Johnson WM; Vale FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9):931-8. PubMed ID: 20375778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Beatson HJ; Serhan H; Sefter JC; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical consequences of cervical spondylectomy versus corpectomy.
Doğan S; Baek S; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct; 63(4 Suppl 2):303-8; discussion 308. PubMed ID: 18981835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The biomechanical stability of a novel spacer with integrated plate in contiguous two-level and three-level ACDF models: an in vitro cadaveric study.
Clavenna AL; Beutler WJ; Gudipally M; Moldavsky M; Khalil S
Spine J; 2012 Feb; 12(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 22405617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization.
Miyanji F; Mahar A; Oka R; Newton P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):E865-9. PubMed ID: 18978579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atlantoaxial fusion: a biomechanical analysis of two C1-C2 fusion techniques.
Claybrooks R; Kayanja M; Milks R; Benzel E
Spine J; 2007; 7(6):682-8. PubMed ID: 17434809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Kretzer RM; Hsu W; Hu N; Umekoji H; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E778-85. PubMed ID: 22228326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a locked plate and wedged graft effectively stabilizes flexion-distraction stage-3 injury in the lower cervical spine: a biomechanical study.
Paxinos O; Ghanayem AJ; Zindrick MR; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Hadjipavlou A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 19127153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lateral mass screw-rod fixation of the cervical spine: a prospective clinical series with 1-year follow-up.
Deen HG; Birch BD; Wharen RE; Reimer R
Spine J; 2003; 3(6):489-95. PubMed ID: 14609694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical investigation of a novel integrated device for intra-articular stabilization of the C1-C2 (atlantoaxial) joint.
Robertson PA; Tsitsopoulos PP; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2012 Feb; 12(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 22341395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
