794 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17981248)
21. Pancreatic duct stents in the prophylaxis of pancreatic damage after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a systematic analysis of benefits and associated risks.
Andriulli A; Forlano R; Napolitano G; Conoscitore P; Caruso N; Pilotto A; Di Sebastiano PL; Leandro G
Digestion; 2007; 75(2-3):156-63. PubMed ID: 17684365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in high risk patients who have undergone prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting: a multicenter retrospective study.
Ito K; Fujita N; Kanno A; Matsubayashi H; Okaniwa S; Nakahara K; Suzuki K; Enohara R;
Intern Med; 2011; 50(24):2927-32. PubMed ID: 22185981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Endoscopic approach to acute pancreatitis.
Kinney TP; Lai R; Freeman ML
Rev Gastroenterol Disord; 2006; 6(3):119-35. PubMed ID: 16957653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Utility of placement of pancreatic duct spontaneous dislodgement stent for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with difficulty in selective biliary cannulation.
Sakai Y; Tsuyuguchi T; Mikata R; Tawada K; Tada M; Togo S; Tamura R; Saito M; Kurosawa J; Ishihara T; Yokosuka O
Hepatogastroenterology; 2011; 58(107-108):687-93. PubMed ID: 21830369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Nonprevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic pancreatitis by pancreatic stent after aspiration of pure pancreatic juice in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.
Harada R; Kawamoto H; Fukatsu H; Kato H; Hirao K; Kurihara N; Mizuno O; Ogawa T; Ishida E; Okada H; Yamamoto K; Yamamoto H
Pancreas; 2010 Apr; 39(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 19823100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pancreatic sphincter hypertension increases the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
Tarnasky P; Cunningham J; Cotton P; Hoffman B; Palesch Y; Freeman J; Curry N; Hawes R
Endoscopy; 1997 May; 29(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 9255527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Post-ERCP pancreatitis in pediatric patients.
Iqbal CW; Baron TH; Moir CR; Ishitani MB
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2009 Oct; 49(4):430-4. PubMed ID: 20032630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prevention and management of adverse events of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Balmadrid B; Kozarek R
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2013 Apr; 23(2):385-403. PubMed ID: 23540966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: review of current preventive strategies.
Feurer ME; Adler DG
Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2012 May; 28(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 22450899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Urgent ERCP with pancreatic stent placement or replacement for salvage of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
Kerdsirichairat T; Attam R; Arain M; Bakman Y; Radosevich D; Freeman M
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1085-94. PubMed ID: 25216326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The modified pancreatic stent system for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a case-control study.
Zhang C; Yang YL; Ma YF; Zhang HW; Li JY; Lin MJ; Shi LJ; Qi CC
BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):108. PubMed ID: 29047328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical study on the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis by pancreatic duct stenting.
Pan XP; Dang T; Meng XM; Xue KC; Chang ZH; Zhang YP
Cell Biochem Biophys; 2011 Dec; 61(3):473-9. PubMed ID: 21739262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for endoscopic snare excision of the duodenal ampulla.
Harewood GC; Pochron NL; Gostout CJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Sep; 62(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 16111953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Treatment of pancreatic duct disruption in children by an endoscopically placed stent.
Canty TG; Weinman D
J Pediatr Surg; 2001 Feb; 36(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 11172431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. What is the most adapted indication of prophylactic pancreatic duct stent within the high-risk group of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis? Using the propensity score analysis.
Takenaka M; Fujita T; Sugiyama D; Masuda A; Shiomi H; Sugimoto M; Sanuki T; Hayakumo T; Azuma T; Kutsumi H
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2014 Apr; 21(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 24039185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound in diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis.
Kinney TP; Freeman ML
Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol; 2005 Dec; 51(4):265-88. PubMed ID: 16282957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improved stent characteristics for prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
Rashdan A; Fogel EL; McHenry L; Sherman S; Temkit M; Lehman GA
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Apr; 2(4):322-9. PubMed ID: 15067627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pancreatic stent insertion: consequences of failure and results of a modified technique to maximize success.
Freeman ML; Overby C; Qi D
Gastrointest Endosc; 2004 Jan; 59(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 14722540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Post-ERCP pancreatitis rates do not differ between needle-knife and pull-type pancreatic sphincterotomy techniques: a multiendoscopist 13-year experience.
Lawrence C; Romagnuolo J; Cotton PB; Payne KM; Hawes RH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Jun; 69(7):1271-5. PubMed ID: 19246037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Risk factors for postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a retrospective analysis of 7,168 cases.
Zhou W; Li Y; Zhang Q; Li X; Meng W; Zhang L; Zhang H; Zhu K; Zhu X
Pancreatology; 2011; 11(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 21894057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
