234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17981380)
1. Can a modified interspinous spacer prevent instability in axial rotation and lateral bending? A biomechanical in vitro study resulting in a new idea.
Kettler A; Drumm J; Heuer F; Haeussler K; Mack C; Claes L; Wilke HJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Feb; 23(2):242-7. PubMed ID: 17981380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous device (Coflex) used to stabilize the lumbar spine.
Tsai KJ; Murakami H; Lowery GL; Hutton WC
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2006; 15(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 17087886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Jul; 131(7):917-26. PubMed ID: 21190031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are the spines of calf, pig and sheep suitable models for pre-clinical implant tests?
Kettler A; Liakos L; Haegele B; Wilke HJ
Eur Spine J; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2186-92. PubMed ID: 17721711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical effect after Coflex and Coflex rivet implantation for segmental instability at surgical and adjacent segments: a finite element analysis.
Lo CC; Tsai KJ; Chen SH; Zhong ZC; Hung C
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2011 Nov; 14(11):969-78. PubMed ID: 21607887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.
Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Gaitanis IN; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):714-22. PubMed ID: 17088203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanics of a novel minimally invasive lumbar interspinous spacer: effects on kinematics, facet loads, and foramen height.
Lazaro BC; Brasiliense LB; Sawa AG; Reyes PM; Theodore N; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
Neurosurgery; 2010 Mar; 66(3 Suppl Operative):126-32; discussion 132-3. PubMed ID: 20173562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Kuhn S; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New interspinous implant evaluation using an in vitro biomechanical study combined with a finite-element analysis.
Lafage V; Gangnet N; Sénégas J; Lavaste F; Skalli W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(16):1706-13. PubMed ID: 17632390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine.
Lindsey DP; Swanson KE; Fuchs P; Hsu KY; Zucherman JF; Yerby SA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(19):2192-7. PubMed ID: 14520030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Effect of Coflex interspinous stabilization and vertebral arch pedicle screw implantation on the stability of three-dimensional motions of the lumbar spine].
Mao ZX; Jiang JM; Yan HB; Zhao WD; Wang FL; Wu Y; Li Y
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Apr; 30(4):863-6. PubMed ID: 20423867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The optimal insertion position of the lumbar interspinous dynamic stabilization device (Coflex): a biomechanical evaluation].
Zu D; Hai Y; Lu S; Yang J; Liu Y; Liu T; Meng X; Zhou L; Pang C
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 52(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 24785455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces.
Rousseau MA; Bradford DS; Bertagnoli R; Hu SS; Lotz JC
Spine J; 2006; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 16651219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics.
Zhu Q; Larson CR; Sjovold SG; Rosler DM; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 17202893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Biomechanical analysis of lumbar spine after implantation of a disk prosthesis and supplementary spinal fusion for management of complications].
Birnbaum K; Phoa T; Maus U; Prescher A; Weisskopf M
Z Orthop Unfall; 2009; 147(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 19693744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
