982 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17982373)
1. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids.
Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):405-18. PubMed ID: 19778388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phonological mismatch and explicit cognitive processing in a sample of 102 hearing-aid users.
Rudner M; Foo C; Sundewall-Thorén E; Lunner T; Rönnberg J
Int J Audiol; 2008 Nov; 47 Suppl 2():S91-8. PubMed ID: 19012116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Lam C; Kraus N
Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cognition counts: a working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU).
Rönnberg J; Rudner M; Foo C; Lunner T
Int J Audiol; 2008 Nov; 47 Suppl 2():S99-105. PubMed ID: 19012117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.
Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Giguère C; Soli SD
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 18349705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].
Lenarz T; Weber BP; Issing PR; Gnadeberg D; Ambjørnsen K; Mack KF; Winter M
Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul; 80(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 11488147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition.
Hällgren M; Larsby B; Arlinger S
Int J Audiol; 2006 Apr; 45(4):227-37. PubMed ID: 16684704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
Shi LF; Doherty KA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech-reception threshold in noise for hearing-impaired listeners in conditions with a varying amplitude-frequency response.
van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():202-6. PubMed ID: 2356728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
Saunders GH; Forsline A
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
Hagerman B
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
