767 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17982835)
1. New CMS 'error' rule has access implications.
Hosp Case Manag; 2007 Nov; 15(11):173-5. PubMed ID: 17982835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Insurers look to CMS' lead. Major players likely to follow rule on preventable errors.
Vesely R
Mod Healthc; 2007 Sep; 37(35):20. PubMed ID: 17960703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. CMS unveils proposed list of 'no-payment' conditions.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2007 Aug; 14(8):85-8. PubMed ID: 17715879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CMS tries cash this time. New quality reporting program has financial incentives.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Apr; 37(15):12-3. PubMed ID: 17494350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Pay-for-performance: Medicare's new reimbursement twist.
Miller-Meeks M
Iowa Med; 2007; 97(1):8. PubMed ID: 17444298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The NCDs for "never events".
Ollapally V
Bull Am Coll Surg; 2009 Apr; 94(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 19492747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. VBP: considering the worst case scenario.
Alexander J
Healthc Financ Manage; 2008 Jan; 62(1):32-3. PubMed ID: 18351248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Time to pay for quality. CMS will partner with premier in trial project to give financial bonuses to hospitals that deliver the best care.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2003 Jun; 33(26):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 12858633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CMS releases proposed rule on value-based purchasing. Quality measures tied to hospital incentives.
Hagland M
Healthc Inform; 2011 Mar; 28(3):56. PubMed ID: 21446269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. CMS "never events" and other new trends in quality health care standards for hospitals.
Bilimoria NM
Health Care Law Mon; 2008 Dec; 2008(12):2-10. PubMed ID: 19385444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality measures gain importance as CMS moves to value-based purchasing.
Hosp Case Manag; 2007 Aug; 15(8):119-21. PubMed ID: 17691253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Weak prospects. Federal Medicaid P4P proposal has skeptics.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Feb; 37(8):10. PubMed ID: 17348345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. CMS rule raises bar on quality.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2011 Sep; 36(9):97-9. PubMed ID: 21942141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. HCFA regulates physician risk taking.
Schwartz HE
Md Med J; 1996 Aug; 45(8):613-4. PubMed ID: 8772274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Piloting does to EMRs. Physicians hope CMS' EHR bonus project portends a broader shift in reimbursement priorities.
Raths D
Healthc Inform; 2008 Feb; 25(2):38, 40. PubMed ID: 18320877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The implications of reimbursement changes for specialty hospitals.
Zimmerman E
Healthc Financ Manage; 2006 Jul; 60(7):42-5. PubMed ID: 16869322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Study casts new doubt on effectiveness of P4P.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2007 Aug; 14(8):88-9. PubMed ID: 17715880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Doc resistance. Quality reporting initiative may be too cumbersome.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 May; 37(22):10-1. PubMed ID: 17612021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Integration demonstration. The CMS' latest pay-for-performance initiative will test the power of integrated delivery systems to alter doc practice patterns.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2005 Oct; 35(44):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 16300201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pay for performance: will your hospital be ready?
O'Hare PK
Healthc Financ Manage; 2005 May; 59(5):46-8. PubMed ID: 15938348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
