These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17983068)

  • 1. Abdominal computed tomography in the evaluation of acute and perforated appendicitis in the community setting.
    Huynh V; Lalezarzadeh F; Lawandy S; Wong DT; Joe VC
    Am Surg; 2007 Oct; 73(10):1002-5. PubMed ID: 17983068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can computed tomography scan be performed effectively in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis without the added morbidity of rectal contrast?
    Dearing DD; Recabaren JA; Alexander M
    Am Surg; 2008 Oct; 74(10):917-20. PubMed ID: 18942613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of preoperative computed tomography on patients undergoing appendectomy.
    McDonald GP; Pendarvis DP; Wilmoth R; Daley BJ
    Am Surg; 2001 Nov; 67(11):1017-21. PubMed ID: 11730216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use and accuracy of computed tomography scan in diagnosing perforated appendicitis.
    Verma R; Grechushkin V; Carter D; Barish M; Pryor A; Telem D
    Am Surg; 2015 Apr; 81(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 25831188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computed tomography scanning for the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis.
    Oliak D; Sinow R; French S; Udani VM; Stamos MJ
    Am Surg; 1999 Oct; 65(10):959-64. PubMed ID: 10515543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates.
    Bendeck SE; Nino-Murcia M; Berry GJ; Jeffrey RB
    Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 12354996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracies of diagnostic methods for acute appendicitis.
    Park JS; Jeong JH; Lee JI; Lee JH; Park JK; Moon HJ
    Am Surg; 2013 Jan; 79(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 23317620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of selective computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of suspected acute appendicitis.
    Hershko DD; Sroka G; Bahouth H; Ghersin E; Mahajna A; Krausz MM
    Am Surg; 2002 Nov; 68(11):1003-7. PubMed ID: 12455796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates.
    Balthazar EJ; Rofsky NM; Zucker R
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 May; 93(5):768-71. PubMed ID: 9625125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of Computed Tomography to Determine Perforation in Patients With Acute Appendicitis.
    Gaskill CE; Simianu VV; Carnell J; Hippe DS; Bhargava P; Flum DR; Davidson GH
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2018; 47(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 28162864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children does not influence the overall rate of negative appendectomy or perforation.
    Weyant MJ; Eachempati SR; Maluccio MA; Spigland N; Hydo LJ; Barie PS
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2001; 2(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12594877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Liberal use of CT scanning helps to diagnose appendicitis in adults.
    Brandt MM; Wahl WL
    Am Surg; 2003 Sep; 69(9):727-31; discussion 731-2. PubMed ID: 14509318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis: accuracy of multidetector CT detection.
    Bixby SD; Lucey BC; Soto JA; Theysohn JM; Ozonoff A; Varghese JC
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):780-6. PubMed ID: 17114626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Negative appendectomy rate: influence of CT scans.
    McGory ML; Zingmond DS; Nanayakkara D; Maggard MA; Ko CY
    Am Surg; 2005 Oct; 71(10):803-8. PubMed ID: 16468523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of perforated and nonperforated appendicitis with CT.
    Yeung KW; Chang MS; Hsiao CP
    Clin Imaging; 2004; 28(6):422-7. PubMed ID: 15531143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of cross-sectional imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates in children.
    Applegate KE; Sivit CJ; Salvator AE; Borisa VJ; Dudgeon DL; Stallion AE; Grisoni ER
    Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 11425980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a pediatric population: to CT or not to CT.
    Stephen AE; Segev DL; Ryan DP; Mullins ME; Kim SH; Schnitzer JJ; Doody DP
    J Pediatr Surg; 2003 Mar; 38(3):367-71; discsussion 367-71. PubMed ID: 12632351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of MRI compared with ultrasound imaging and selective use of CT to discriminate simple from perforated appendicitis.
    Leeuwenburgh MM; Wiezer MJ; Wiarda BM; Bouma WH; Phoa SS; Stockmann HB; Jensch S; Bossuyt PM; Boermeester MA; Stoker J;
    Br J Surg; 2014 Jan; 101(1):e147-55. PubMed ID: 24272981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When should we order a CT scan and when should we rely on the results to diagnose an acute appendicitis?
    Ceydeli A; Lavotshkin S; Yu J; Wise L
    Curr Surg; 2006; 63(6):464-8. PubMed ID: 17084779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.
    Lee SL; Walsh AJ; Ho HS
    Arch Surg; 2001 May; 136(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 11343547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.