These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment. Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD; Cohen AL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1160-73. PubMed ID: 14622053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cue abstraction and exemplar memory in categorization. Juslin P; Jones S; Olsson H; Winman A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):924-41. PubMed ID: 14516225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: retrieval primacy as a key determinant of its use. Pachur T; Hertwig R J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):983-1002. PubMed ID: 16938041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Models of quantitative estimations: rule-based and exemplar-based processes compared. von Helversen B; Rieskamp J J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):867-89. PubMed ID: 19586258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sequence effects in the categorization of tones varying in frequency. Stewart N; Brown GD J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):416-30. PubMed ID: 14979815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Category representation for classification and feature inference. Johansen MK; Kruschke JK J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1433-58. PubMed ID: 16393056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Type of learning task impacts performance and strategy selection in decision making. Pachur T; Olsson H Cogn Psychol; 2012 Sep; 65(2):207-40. PubMed ID: 22575684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Overconfidence effects in category learning: a comparison of connectionist and exemplar memory models. Sieck WR; Yates JF J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jul; 27(4):1003-21. PubMed ID: 11486916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exemplar and prototype models revisited: response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization. Nosofsky RM; Zaki SR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):924-40. PubMed ID: 12219799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When one cue is not enough: combining fast and frugal heuristics with compound cue processing. Garcia-Retamero R; Hoffrage U; Dieckmann A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Sep; 60(9):1197-215. PubMed ID: 17676553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Classification response times in probabilistic rule-based category structures: contrasting exemplar-retrieval and decision-boundary models. Nosofsky RM; Little DR Mem Cognit; 2010 Oct; 38(7):916-27. PubMed ID: 20921104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Between ignorance and truth: Partition dependence and learning in judgment under uncertainty. See KE; Fox CR; Rottenstreich YS J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1385-402. PubMed ID: 17087591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An exemplar account of the bow and set-size effects in absolute identification. Kent C; Lamberts K J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):289-305. PubMed ID: 15755246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SSL: a theory of how people learn to select strategies. Rieskamp J; Otto PE J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):207-36. PubMed ID: 16719651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Better learning with more error: probabilistic feedback increases sensitivity to correlated cues in categorization. Little DR; Lewandowsky S J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1041-61. PubMed ID: 19586269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Glöckner A; Betsch T J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1055-75. PubMed ID: 18763891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]