372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17983312)
21. Task-specific auditory distraction in serial recall and mental arithmetic.
Kattner F; Hanl S; Paul L; Ellermeier W
Mem Cognit; 2023 May; 51(4):930-951. PubMed ID: 36239898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A negative order-repetition priming effect: inhibition of order in unattended auditory sequences?
Hughes R; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):199-218. PubMed ID: 12669758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Perceptual-gestural (mis)mapping in serial short-term memory: the impact of talker variability.
Hughes RW; Marsh JE; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1411-25. PubMed ID: 19857013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The involuntary capture of attention by novel feature pairings: a study of voice-location integration in auditory sensory memory.
Parmentier FB; Maybery MT; Elsley J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 20139445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Detrimental effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall of visual items are reflected in reduced visual N1 and reduced theta activity.
Weisz N; Schlittmeier SJ
Cereb Cortex; 2006 Aug; 16(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 16221927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
Olivers CN
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Equivalent auditory distraction in children and adults.
Röer JP; Bell R; Körner U; Buchner A
J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Aug; 172():41-58. PubMed ID: 29574236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. When is forewarned forearmed? Predicting auditory distraction in short-term memory.
Hughes RW; Marsh JE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):427-442. PubMed ID: 31180705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Postcategorical auditory distraction in short-term memory: Insights from increased task load and task type.
Marsh JE; Yang J; Qualter P; Richardson C; Perham N; Vachon F; Hughes RW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jun; 44(6):882-897. PubMed ID: 29389192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task.
Parmentier FB; Elford G; Escera C; Andrés P; San Miguel I
Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):408-32. PubMed ID: 17445791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Episodic long-term memory of spoken discourse masked by speech: what is the role for working memory capacity?
Sörqvist P; Rönnberg J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):210-8. PubMed ID: 22199182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. High working memory capacity attenuates the deviation effect but not the changing-state effect: further support for the duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.
Sörqvist P
Mem Cognit; 2010 Jul; 38(5):651-8. PubMed ID: 20551344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.
Leist L; Lachmann T; Schlittmeier SJ; Georgi M; Klatte M
Mem Cognit; 2023 Feb; 51(2):307-320. PubMed ID: 36190658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Auditory distraction and serial memory: the avoidable and the ineluctable.
Jones DM; Hughes RW; Macken WJ
Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):201-9. PubMed ID: 20871174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Direction of report in spatial and verbal serial short-term memory.
Farrand P; Jones D
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Feb; 49(1):140-58. PubMed ID: 8920100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cross-modal distraction by background speech: what role for meaning?
Marsh JE; Jones DM
Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):210-6. PubMed ID: 20871175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reduction in auditory distraction by retrieval strategy.
Perham N; Banbury SP; Jones DM
Memory; 2007 May; 15(4):465-73. PubMed ID: 17469024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optimizing the auditory distraction paradigm: behavioral and event-related potential effects in a lateralized multi-deviant approach.
Grimm S; Schröger E; Bendixen A; Bäss P; Roye A; Deouell LY
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr; 119(4):934-47. PubMed ID: 18289933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?
Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Klatte M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 18421641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Disruption of short-term memory by distractor speech: does content matter?
Bell R; Mund I; Buchner A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jan; 64(1):146-68. PubMed ID: 20544562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
