270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17983376)
21. Assessment of the sensitizing potency of preservatives with chance of skin contact by the loose-fit coculture-based sensitization assay (LCSA).
Sonnenburg A; Schreiner M; Stahlmann R
Arch Toxicol; 2015 Dec; 89(12):2339-44. PubMed ID: 25395006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of the skin sensitization potential of chemicals in THP-1/keratinocyte co-cultures.
Cao YP; Ma PC; Liu WD; Zhou WQ; Tao Y; Zhang ML; Li LJ; Chen ZY
Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol; 2012 Apr; 34(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 21721923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Use of IL-18 production in a human keratinocyte cell line to discriminate contact sensitizers from irritants and low molecular weight respiratory allergens.
Corsini E; Mitjans M; Galbiati V; Lucchi L; Galli CL; Marinovich M
Toxicol In Vitro; 2009 Aug; 23(5):789-96. PubMed ID: 19397996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Progress on the development of human in vitro dendritic cell based assays for assessment of the sensitizing potential of a compound.
dos Santos GG; Reinders J; Ouwehand K; Rustemeyer T; Scheper RJ; Gibbs S
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 May; 236(3):372-82. PubMed ID: 19232364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An in vitro assay to screen for the sensitizing potential of xenobiotics.
Wanner R; Schreiner M
ALTEX; 2008; 25(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 18551235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The local lymph node assay: current position in the regulatory classification of skin sensitizing chemicals.
Basketter DA; Gerberick GF; Kimber I
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 18058304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay.
Jowsey IR; Clapp CJ; Safford B; Gibbons BT; Basketter DA
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18568891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Capacity of CD34+ progenitor-derived dendritic cells to distinguish between sensitizers and irritants.
De Smedt AC; Van Den Heuvel RL; Van Tendeloo VF; Berneman ZN; Schoeters GE
Toxicol Lett; 2005 Apr; 156(3):377-89. PubMed ID: 15763637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Gene expression studies in cultured dendritic cells: new indicators for the discrimination of skin sensitizers and irritants in vitro.
Szameit S; Vierlinger K; Farmer L; Tuschl H; Noehammer C
Clin Exp Allergy; 2009 Jun; 39(6):856-68. PubMed ID: 19302251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment.
Basketter D; Darlenski R; Fluhr JW
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2008; 21(4):191-202. PubMed ID: 18509253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dendritic cells: biology of the skin.
Toebak MJ; Gibbs S; Bruynzeel DP; Scheper RJ; Rustemeyer T
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Jan; 60(1):2-20. PubMed ID: 19125717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Differential effects of allergens and irritants on early differentiating monocyte-derived dendritic cells.
Furio L; Guezennec A; Ducarre B; Guesnet J; Peguet-Navarro J
Eur J Dermatol; 2008; 18(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18424372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. CXCL8 secretion by dendritic cells predicts contact allergens from irritants.
Toebak MJ; Pohlmann PR; Sampat-Sardjoepersad SC; von Blomberg BM; Bruynzeel DP; Scheper RJ; Rustemeyer T; Gibbs S
Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Feb; 20(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 16099135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative analysis of skin sensitization potency of acrylates (methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and ethylhexyl acrylate) using the local lymph node assay.
Dearman RJ; Betts CJ; Farr C; McLaughlin J; Berdasco N; Wiench K; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Oct; 57(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 17868217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Gene expression changes in peripheral blood-derived dendritic cells following exposure to a contact allergen.
Ryan CA; Gildea LA; Hulette BC; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Gerberick GF
Toxicol Lett; 2004 May; 150(3):301-16. PubMed ID: 15110082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: status of validation.
Basketter DA; Gerberick F; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 17627643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Interactions of contact allergens with dendritic cells: opportunities and challenges for the development of novel approaches to hazard assessment.
Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Gildea LA; Hulette BC; Betts CJ; Cumberbatch M; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Toxicol Sci; 2005 Nov; 88(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 16014741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The local lymph node assay being too sensitive?
Hans-Werner V; Jürgen AH
Arch Toxicol; 2005 Dec; 79(12):721-8. PubMed ID: 16025312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
