686 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17983675)
1. Patent border wars: defining the boundary between scientific discoveries and patentable inventions.
Holman CM
Trends Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 25(12):539-43. PubMed ID: 17983675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patent first, ask questions later: morality and biotechnology in patent law.
Bagley MA
William Mary Law Rev; 2003 Dec; 45(2):469-547. PubMed ID: 15570677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Encouraging further innovation: Ariad v. Eli Lilly and the written description requirement.
Jakas J
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2012; 42(3):1287-36. PubMed ID: 22803220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Patent protection for Aspergillus-related inventions.
Jong SC; Birmingham JM
Biotechnology; 1992; 23():297-311. PubMed ID: 1504603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patent crunch pending.
Wadman M
Nature; 2007 Oct; 449(7163):651. PubMed ID: 17968400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Patents on life? No patent on life!].
van Raden L
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1998 Mar; 105(3):90-3. PubMed ID: 9581373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The application of the patent laws to the drug approval process.
Coggio BD; Cerrito FD
Food Drug Law J; 1997; 52(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 10346669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic testing of genetic disorders: limiting the scope of patent claims through disclosure requirements.
Abbot J
J Law Med; 2006 Aug; 14(1):110-26. PubMed ID: 16937785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patent fight sparks biological warfare in the drug industry.
Fortune; 2000 Jul; 142(3):40, 42. PubMed ID: 11066662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. US courts narrow patent exemptions.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):834. PubMed ID: 12894182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Roche faces charges over Taq patent claim.
Abbott A
Nature; 1996 Aug; 382(6593):660. PubMed ID: 8751427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Proposed changes to patent code loom over biotech industry.
Coombs A
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 25(12):1333-4. PubMed ID: 18066010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patenting nanotechnology.
Lemley MA
Stanford Law Rev; 2005 Nov; 58(2):601-30. PubMed ID: 16395838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biotech patents: the world is your oyster--or mouse--or (you name it).
Alix JE
Technol Health Care; 1996 Sep; 4(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 8931235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patent prosecution of biotechnology and pharmaceutical patents in a changing legal landscape.
Lu DL; Kowalski TJ; Jarecki-Black J
Future Med Chem; 2010 Jan; 2(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 21426040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The burgeoning science of genetics and the impact on public policy.
Hatch OG
J Biolaw Bus; 2004; 7(4):3-6. PubMed ID: 15675088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nontraditional publications and their effect on patentable inventions.
Garabedian TE
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):401-2. PubMed ID: 11923849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pharmaceutical patent life-cycle management after KSR v. Teleflex.
Furrow ME
Food Drug Law J; 2008; 63(1):275-320. PubMed ID: 18561462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Patent law. Natural substances and patentable inventions.
Demaine LJ; Fellmeth AX
Science; 2003 May; 300(5624):1375-6. PubMed ID: 12775825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cabilly patent finale.
Waltz E
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Aug; 26(8):846. PubMed ID: 18688222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
