These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17984100)

  • 1. Clinical research of kidney diseases 1: researchable questions and valid answers.
    Ravani P; Parfrey PS; Curtis B; Barrett BJ
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Dec; 22(12):3681-90. PubMed ID: 17984100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical research of kidney diseases 1: researchable questions and valid answers.
    Ravani P; Parfrey PS; Curtis B; Barrett BJ
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Sep; 22(9):2459-68. PubMed ID: 17724059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical research of kidney diseases II: problems of study design.
    Ravani P; Parfrey PS; Dicks E; Barrett BJ
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2785-94. PubMed ID: 17890738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Biases in clinical research].
    Lièvre M
    Rev Prat; 2003 Dec; 53(19):2096-8. PubMed ID: 15008464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selection bias and information bias in clinical research.
    Tripepi G; Jager KJ; Dekker FW; Zoccali C
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2010; 115(2):c94-9. PubMed ID: 20407272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beware the creeping cracks of bias.
    Sarewitz D
    Nature; 2012 May; 485(7397):149. PubMed ID: 22575922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Causality in nephrology: study design and objectives of future research].
    Strippoli GF; Manno C; Schena FP
    G Ital Nefrol; 2003; 20(5):503-11. PubMed ID: 14634966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Straying in the methodology. II. Bias introduced by questionnaires].
    Pouwer F; van der Ploeg HM; Bramsen I
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Jul; 142(27):1556-8. PubMed ID: 9763830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Some problems related to the collection of demographic data in the population censuses taken in Latin America during the 1980s].
    Arretx C; Chackiel J
    Notas Poblacion; 1986 Dec; 14(42):51-76. PubMed ID: 12314803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Secondary analysis: theoretical, methodological, and practical considerations.
    Clarke SP; Cossette S
    Can J Nurs Res; 2000 Dec; 32(3):109-29. PubMed ID: 11928128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Small study on industry trial sponsorship leads to big questions about quality and bias.
    Twombly R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Jul; 99(13):988-90. PubMed ID: 17596566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Right answers, wrong questions in clinical research.
    Horwitz RI; Abell JE; Christian JB; Wivel AE
    Sci Transl Med; 2014 Jan; 6(221):221fs5. PubMed ID: 24476999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias in surgical research.
    Paradis C
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 18650626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biasphobia.
    Morse JM
    Qual Health Res; 2003 Sep; 13(7):891-2. PubMed ID: 14502955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uncertainty and sampling error.
    Altman DG; Bland JM
    BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g7064. PubMed ID: 25424395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asking good clinical research questions and choosing the right study design.
    Bragge P
    Injury; 2010 Jul; 41 Suppl 1():S3-6. PubMed ID: 20466367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of patient selection in various study designs: identifying potential bias in clinical results.
    Berbano EP; Baxi N
    South Med J; 2012 Mar; 105(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 22392211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical research 3: Sample selection.
    Endacott R; Botti M
    Accid Emerg Nurs; 2007 Oct; 15(4):234-8. PubMed ID: 17420129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Studying rare outcomes].
    Reutfors J; Olén O; Magnusson C; Pettersson A
    Lakartidningen; 2013 Feb 13-19; 110(7):334-7. PubMed ID: 23513378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychology of the scientist: LXXXIII. An assessment of Herek's critique of the Cameron group's survey studies.
    Schumm WR
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Dec; 87(3 Pt 2):1123-32. PubMed ID: 11272752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.