These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

638 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17985634)

  • 1. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
    Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.
    Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Goodsitt M; Carson PL; Hadjiiski L; Schmitz A; Eberhard JW; Claus BE
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5703-12. PubMed ID: 21992385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I; Ghetti C
    Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1199-207. PubMed ID: 19472626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Goodsitt MM; Hadjiiski LM; Ge J; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3781-95. PubMed ID: 17089843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oblique reconstructions in tomosynthesis. II. Super-resolution.
    Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111912. PubMed ID: 24320445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of back projection methods for breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction.
    Zhou W; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
    J Digit Imaging; 2015 Jun; 28(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25384538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of source blur on digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
    Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5572-5592. PubMed ID: 31494953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
    Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system.
    Zhao B; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1978-87. PubMed ID: 18561674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system.
    Zhou J; Zhao B; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):1098-109. PubMed ID: 17441255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Full-field breast tomosynthesis.
    Smith A
    Radiol Manage; 2005; 27(5):25-31. PubMed ID: 16294583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu T; Moore RH; Rafferty EA; Kopans DB
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2636-47. PubMed ID: 15487747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of algorithms for out-of-plane artifacts removal in digital tomosynthesis reconstructions.
    Bliznakova K; Bliznakov Z; Buliev I
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Jul; 107(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 22056810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach.
    Hu YH; Zhao B; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5242-52. PubMed ID: 19175083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multigrid reconstruction with block-iterative updates for breast tomosynthesis.
    Michielsen K; Nuyts J
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6537-48. PubMed ID: 26520744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential.
    Dobbins JT; Godfrey DJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Oct; 48(19):R65-106. PubMed ID: 14579853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao B; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5219-32. PubMed ID: 19175081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital tomosynthesis: technique.
    Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May; 52(3):489-97. PubMed ID: 24792651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oblique reconstructions in tomosynthesis. I. Linear systems theory.
    Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111911. PubMed ID: 24320444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.