These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17985793)

  • 1. Near visual acuity for everyday activities with accommodative and monofocal intraocular lenses.
    Sanders DR; Sanders ML
    J Refract Surg; 2007 Oct; 23(8):747-51. PubMed ID: 17985793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accommodative intraocular lens versus standard monofocal intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery.
    Ong HS; Evans JR; Allan BD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 May; 2014(5):CD009667. PubMed ID: 24788900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens.
    Heatley CJ; Spalton DJ; Hancox J; Kumar A; Marshall J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 140(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 15992754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the 1CU accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses: a randomized trial.
    Harman FE; Maling S; Kampougeris G; Langan L; Khan I; Lee N; Bloom PA
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Jun; 115(6):993-1001.e2. PubMed ID: 18031818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective measurement of intraocular lens movement and dioptric change with a focus shift accommodating intraocular lens.
    Hancox J; Spalton D; Heatley C; Jayaram H; Marshall J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1098-103. PubMed ID: 16857494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses.
    Küchle M; Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Gusek-Schneider GC; Martus P; Nguyen NX;
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Feb; 111(2):318-24. PubMed ID: 15019382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional assessment of two different accommodative intraocular lenses compared with a monofocal intraocular lens.
    Marchini G; Mora P; Pedrotti E; Manzotti F; Aldigeri R; Gandolfi SA
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Nov; 114(11):2038-43. PubMed ID: 17555820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens.
    Wolffsohn JS; Hunt OA; Naroo S; Gilmartin B; Shah S; Cunliffe IA; Benson MT; Mantry S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1230-5. PubMed ID: 16505063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional reading acuity and performance: Comparison of 2 accommodating intraocular lenses.
    Brown D; Dougherty P; Gills JP; Hunkeler J; Sanders DR; Sanders ML
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1711-4. PubMed ID: 19781464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual performance results after Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens implantation.
    Sanders DR; Sanders ML
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1679-84. PubMed ID: 17368545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens.
    Dogru M; Honda R; Omoto M; Toda I; Fujishima H; Arai H; Matsuyama M; Nishijima S; Hida Y; Yagi Y; Tsubota K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 15975453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of Accommodative Performance of a New Accommodative Intraocular Lens.
    Alió JL; Simonov AN; Romero D; Angelov A; Angelov Y; van Lawick W; Rombach MC
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Feb; 34(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 29425385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation.
    Macsai MS; Padnick-Silver L; Fontes BM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Apr; 32(4):628-33. PubMed ID: 16698485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bilateral reading performance of 4 multifocal intraocular lens models and a monofocal intraocular lens under bright lighting conditions.
    Rasp M; Bachernegg A; Seyeddain O; Ruckhofer J; Emesz M; Stoiber J; Grabner G; Dexl AK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1950-61. PubMed ID: 23079311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual Outcomes and Accommodative Response of the Lumina Accommodative Intraocular Lens.
    Alio JL; Simonov A; Plaza-Puche AB; Angelov A; Angelov Y; van Lawick W; Rombach M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 164():37-48. PubMed ID: 26829595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of visual results with accommodating intraocular lenses versus mini-monovision with a monofocal intraocular lens.
    Beiko GHH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jan; 39(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23098630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses.
    Hancox J; Spalton D; Heatley C; Jayaram H; Yip J; Boyce J; Marshall J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 17321391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accommodation after Nd: YAG capsulotomy in patients with accommodative posterior chamber lens 1CU.
    Nguyen NX; Seitz B; Reese S; Langenbucher A; Küchle M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Feb; 243(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 15599585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective randomised double-masked trial of bilateral multifocal, bifocal or monofocal intraocular lenses.
    Leyland MD; Langan L; Goolfee F; Lee N; Bloom PA
    Eye (Lond); 2002 Jul; 16(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 12101459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraocular lenses for the treatment of age-related cataracts: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2009; 9(15):1-62. PubMed ID: 23074519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.