These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17986670)

  • 1. Convergence between cluster analysis and the Angoff method for setting minimum passing scores on credentialing examinations.
    Hess B; Subhiyah RG; Giordano C
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Dec; 30(4):362-75. PubMed ID: 17986670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is an Angoff standard an indication of minimal competence of examinees or of judges?
    Verheggen MM; Muijtjens AM; Van Os J; Schuwirth LW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 May; 13(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 17043915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do baseline data influence standard setting for a clinical skills examination?
    Wayne DB; Barsuk JH; Cohen E; McGaghie WC
    Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S105-8. PubMed ID: 17895672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.
    Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; van der Vleuten C; van der Velden U
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 13(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 19630935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A validity study of expert judgment procedures for setting cutoff scores on high-stakes credentialing examinations using cluster analysis.
    Violato C; Marini A; Lee C
    Eval Health Prof; 2003 Mar; 26(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 12629922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A work-centered approach for setting passing scores on performance-based assessments.
    McKinley DW; Boulet JR; Hambleton RK
    Eval Health Prof; 2005 Sep; 28(3):349-69. PubMed ID: 16123262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of passing scores on certification examinations: an unresolved issue.
    Karni KR; Lofsness KG
    J Allied Health; 1985 Nov; 14(4):415-26. PubMed ID: 3880065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37.
    Bandaranayake RC
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(9-10):836-45. PubMed ID: 19117221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Setting defensible standards for cardiac auscultation skills in medical students.
    Wayne DB; Butter J; Cohen ER; McGaghie WC
    Acad Med; 2009 Oct; 84(10 Suppl):S94-6. PubMed ID: 19907398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factor analysis can be a useful standard setting tool in a high stakes OSCE assessment.
    Chesser AM; Laing MR; Miedzybrodzka ZH; Brittenden J; Heys SD
    Med Educ; 2004 Aug; 38(8):825-31. PubMed ID: 15271042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validating standard setting with a modified nedelsky procedure through common item test equating.
    Smith RM; Gross LJ
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 9661719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the minimum number of judges required for test-centred standard setting on written assessments. do discussion and iteration have an influence?
    Fowell SL; Fewtrell R; McLaughlin PJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 16957872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Procedures for establishing defensible absolute passing scores on performance examinations in health professions education.
    Downing SM; Tekian A; Yudkowsky R
    Teach Learn Med; 2006; 18(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 16354141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simpler standards for local performance examinations: the Yes/No Angoff and whole-test Ebel.
    Yudkowsky R; Downing SM; Wirth S
    Teach Learn Med; 2008; 20(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 18615294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement practices: methods for developing content-valid student examinations.
    Bridge PD; Musial J; Frank R; Roe T; Sawilowsky S
    Med Teach; 2003 Jul; 25(4):414-21. PubMed ID: 12893554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Angoff Method of Setting Cut Scores for High-Stakes Testing: Foley Catheter Checkoff as an Exemplar.
    Kardong-Edgren S; Mulcock PM
    Nurse Educ; 2016; 41(2):80-2. PubMed ID: 26402909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The validation process of incorporating simulation-based accreditation into the anesthesiology Israeli national board exams.
    Berkenstadt H; Ziv A; Gafni N; Sidi A
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2006 Oct; 8(10):728-33. PubMed ID: 17125130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A model for setting performance standards for standardized patient examinations.
    Talente G; Haist SA; Wilson JF
    Eval Health Prof; 2003 Dec; 26(4):427-46. PubMed ID: 14631613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The validity of subscores for a credentialing test.
    Haladyna TM; Kramer GA
    Eval Health Prof; 2004 Dec; 27(4):349-68. PubMed ID: 15492047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Setting a standard on the pilot National Board Dental Examination.
    Kramer GA; DeMarais DR
    J Dent Educ; 1992 Oct; 56(10):684-8. PubMed ID: 1430520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.