These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17987090)

  • 21. Age-specific interval breast cancers in Japan: estimation of the proper sensitivity of screening using a population-based cancer registry.
    Suzuki A; Kuriyama S; Kawai M; Amari M; Takeda M; Ishida T; Ohnuki K; Nishino Y; Tsuji I; Shibuya D; Ohuchi N
    Cancer Sci; 2008 Nov; 99(11):2264-7. PubMed ID: 18795941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Mammographic screening in the municipality of Copenhagen].
    Dige U
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Apr; 164(16):2177-8. PubMed ID: 11989065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of service screening on breast cancer mortality rates.
    Cox B
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Aug; 17(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 18562953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficacy of screening mammography for women in their forties.
    Shapiro S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1994 Nov; 86(22):1722; author reply 1722-5. PubMed ID: 7966402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Screening for breast cancer in Iran: a challenge for health policy makers.
    Mousavi SM; Harirchi I; Ebrahimi M; Mohagheghi MA; Montazeri A; Jarrahi AM; Gouya MM; Miller AB
    Breast J; 2008; 14(6):605-6. PubMed ID: 19000044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reducing the effects of lead-time bias, length bias and over-detection in evaluating screening mammography: a censored bivariate data approach.
    Mahnken JD; Chan W; Freeman DH; Freeman JL
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):643-63. PubMed ID: 18445697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Summary of the practice guideline 'Diagnosis of breast cancer' (second revision) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners].
    Wiersma T; de Bock GH; Corsten MC; Scheele ME; Goudswaard AN
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A154. PubMed ID: 19818178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Mammography screening--ideology contra science].
    Vejborg I; Kroman NT; Christiansen P; Mouridsen HT; Flyger H
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Jun; 168(23):2263; author reply 2263-5. PubMed ID: 16768984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Screening mammography: a cross-sectional study to compare characteristics of women aged 40 and older from the deep South who are current, overdue, and never screeners.
    Lopez ED; Khoury AJ; Dailey AB; Hall AG; Chisholm LR
    Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(6):434-45. PubMed ID: 19879455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Breast cancer screening in an adult literacy program.
    Johnson RM; Smith P; Strauss EJ; Higgins A; Jensen DR; Weiss BD
    Alaska Med; 2008; 49(4):126-30. PubMed ID: 18491805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The mammographic screening trials: commentary on the recent work by Olsen and Gøtzsche.
    Duffy S; Tabár L; Smith RA
    J Surg Oncol; 2002 Dec; 81(4):159-62; discussion 162-6. PubMed ID: 12451615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Breast cancer screening practice of Chinese elderly worth re-evaluation of health promotion policy.
    Chor JS; Leung JC; Chan DC; Leung PC; Griffiths S
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2008 Mar; 30(1):110-1. PubMed ID: 18211917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An approach to enhance communication about screening mammography in primary care.
    Nekhlyudov L; Braddock CH
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Sep; 18(9):1403-12. PubMed ID: 19708801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Scheduling mammography screening for the early detection of breast cancer in Korean women.
    Lee SY; Jeong SH; Kim J; Jung SH; Song KB; Nam CM
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(4):205-9. PubMed ID: 18078566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of cancer screening services in Greece and associated social factors: results from the nation-wide Hellas Health I survey.
    Dimitrakaki C; Boulamatsis D; Mariolis A; Kontodimopoulos N; Niakas D; Tountas Y
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2009 Jun; 18(3):248-57. PubMed ID: 19491613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Molecular subtypes of breast cancers detected in mammography screening and outside of screening.
    Sihto H; Lundin J; Lehtimäki T; Sarlomo-Rikala M; Bützow R; Holli K; Sailas L; Kataja V; Lundin M; Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T; Isola J; Heikkilä P; Joensuu H
    Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Jul; 14(13):4103-10. PubMed ID: 18593987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence.
    Tang TS; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA; Duan L
    Psychooncology; 2009 Jul; 18(7):727-34. PubMed ID: 19035468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Predictors of breast cancer-related distress following mammography screening in younger women on a family history breast screening programme.
    Brain K; Henderson BJ; Tyndel S; Bankhead C; Watson E; Clements A; Austoker J;
    Psychooncology; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1180-8. PubMed ID: 18506670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficacy of screening mammography for women in their forties.
    Peer PG; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Holland R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1994 Nov; 86(22):1725; author reply 1725-9. PubMed ID: 7966403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Readers respond to "Mammoscam revisited".
    Faris JC
    N C Med J; 1993 Jul; 54(7):304; author reply 304, 306. PubMed ID: 8350925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.