BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17987591)

  • 1. Expectations of general practitioners and specialist doctors regarding the feedback received after reporting an adverse drug reaction.
    Cornelissen L; van Puijenbroek E; van Grootheest K
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Jan; 17(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 17987591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adverse drug reaction reporting by general medical practitioners and retail pharmacists in Harare--a pilot study.
    Ball D; Tisócki T
    Cent Afr J Med; 1998 Aug; 44(8):190-5. PubMed ID: 10101417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expectations for feedback in adverse drug reporting by healthcare professionals in the Netherlands.
    Oosterhuis I; van Hunsel FP; van Puijenbroek EP
    Drug Saf; 2012 Mar; 35(3):221-32. PubMed ID: 22201474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Reasons to report or not report side effects of drugs to the national monitoring system in the Netherlands].
    van Riemsdijk MM; Herings RM; Rawlins MD; Stricker BH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Nov; 139(45):2306-8. PubMed ID: 7501063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Specialists without qualification. An interview study among general practitioners].
    Steen M; Hoftvedt BO; Laerum E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1992 Apr; 112(10):1317-9. PubMed ID: 1579917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physicians' opinions and experiences of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Reform.
    Andersson K; Jörgensen T; Carlsten A
    Scand J Public Health; 2006; 34(6):654-9. PubMed ID: 17132599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contribution of pharmacists to the reporting of adverse drug reactions.
    van Grootheest AC; van Puijenbroek EP; de Jong-van den Berg LT
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2002; 11(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 12051119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Pharmacovigilance seen by a selected group of general practitioners and of residents in the Midi-Pyrénées region].
    Pouget-Zago P; Lapeyre-Mestre M; Bagheri H; Montastruc JL
    Therapie; 1995; 50(5):459-62. PubMed ID: 8571286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Special medical care in the opinion of general practitioners].
    Kurpas D; Grata-Borkowska U; Jedrzejewski W; Steciwko A
    Wiad Lek; 2002; 55 Suppl 1():296-300. PubMed ID: 15002258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Communication between general practitioners and chiropractors.
    Brussee WJ; Assendelft WJ; Breen AC
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Jan; 24(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11174690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [General practitioner views on drug-assisted rehabilitation and the Norwegian substance abuse reform].
    Aasland OG; Spilhaug G; Johannesen A
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Jan; 129(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 19151800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of Dutch family doctors' and patients' perspectives on nutrition communication.
    van Dillen SM; Hiddink GJ
    Fam Pract; 2008 Dec; 25 Suppl 1():i87-92. PubMed ID: 18805910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How do general practitioners rate their relationship with gastroenterologists?
    Cardin F; Franco-Novelletto B; Fassina R; Sturniolo G
    Dig Liver Dis; 2004 May; 36(5):315-21. PubMed ID: 15191199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Adverse events following vaccination reported to the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Center Lareb in 2004-2006].
    Labadie J; van Grootheest AC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Dec; 151(49):2738-42. PubMed ID: 18225798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Direct reporting of side effects by the patient: favourable experience in the first year].
    van Grootheest AC; Passier JL; van Puijenbroek EP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Mar; 149(10):529-33. PubMed ID: 15782689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence exerted on drug prescribing by patients' attitudes and expectations and by doctors' perception of such expectations: a cohort and nested case-control study.
    Lado E; Vacariza M; Fernández-González C; Gestal-Otero JJ; Figueiras A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Jun; 14(3):453-9. PubMed ID: 18373568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nutrition communication styles of family doctors: results of quantitative research.
    van Dillen SM; Hiddink GJ; Koelen MA; van Woerkum CM
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2005 Aug; 59 Suppl 1():S47-55; discussion S56. PubMed ID: 16052196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring patients' experiences with individual specialist physicians and their practices.
    Rodriguez HP; von Glahn T; Chang H; Rogers WH; Safran DG
    Am J Med Qual; 2009; 24(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 19139462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feedback for patients reporting adverse drug reactions; satisfaction and expectations.
    Rolfes L; van Hunsel F; van Grootheest K; van Puijenbroek E
    Expert Opin Drug Saf; 2015 May; 14(5):625-32. PubMed ID: 25766456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reporting of adverse drug reactions may be influenced by feedback to the reporting doctor.
    Wallerstedt SM; Brunlöf G; Johansson ML; Tukukino C; Ny L
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2007 May; 63(5):505-8. PubMed ID: 17347804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.