These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17987779)

  • 1. Comparison of fundamental frequency nasalance between trained singers and nonsingers for sung vowels.
    Fowler LP; Morris RJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2007 Oct; 116(10):739-46. PubMed ID: 17987779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of vowels on nasalance scores.
    Lewis KE; Watterson T; Quint T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Nov; 37(6):584-9. PubMed ID: 11108528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vowel intelligibility in classical singing.
    Gregg JW; Scherer RC
    J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):198-210. PubMed ID: 16139988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of frequency range, vowel, dynamic loudness level, and gender on nasalance in amateur and classically trained singers.
    Jennings JJ; Kuehn DP
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):75-89. PubMed ID: 17084591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The correlation between nasalance and a differentiated perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency.
    Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; van Wijngaarden HA; Dejonckere PH
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 12019003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spectral analysis of sung vowels. I. Variation due to differences between vowels, singers, and modes of singing.
    Bloothooft G; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Apr; 75(4):1259-64. PubMed ID: 6725777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation between the perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency and composite measures derived from mean nasalance scores.
    Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; Dejonckere PH
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2004; 56(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 15087571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of nasal acceleration and nasalance across vowels.
    Thorp EB; Virnik BT; Stepp CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1476-84. PubMed ID: 23838984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic analyses of trained singers perceptually identified from speaking samples.
    Rothman HB; Brown WS; Sapienza CM; Morris RJ
    J Voice; 2001 Mar; 15(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 12269632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Identification of High-pitched Sung Vowels in Sense and Nonsense Words by Professional Singers and Untrained Listeners.
    Deme A
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):252.e1-252.e14. PubMed ID: 27522944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intelligibility of sung vowels: the effect of consonantal context and the onset of voicing.
    Deme A
    J Voice; 2014 Jul; 28(4):523.e19-25. PubMed ID: 24698886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual and acoustic study of professionally trained versus untrained voices.
    Brown WS; Rothman HB; Sapienza CM
    J Voice; 2000 Sep; 14(3):301-9. PubMed ID: 11021498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustical analysis of the underlying voice differences between two groups of professional singers: opera and country and western.
    Burns P
    Laryngoscope; 1986 May; 96(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 3702569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained from the Nasometer and the NasalView.
    Lewis KE; Watterson T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Jan; 40(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12498604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Average loudness level, mean fundamental frequency, and subglottal pressure: comparison between female singers and nonsingers.
    Akerlund L; Gramming P
    J Voice; 1994 Sep; 8(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 7987429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic measures of the voices of older singers and nonsingers.
    Prakup B
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 21889299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of vocal training on singing and speaking voice characteristics in vocally healthy adults and children based on choral and nonchoral data.
    Siupsinskiene N; Lycke H
    J Voice; 2011 Jul; 25(4):e177-89. PubMed ID: 20702062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of velopharyngeal function after relocation pharyngoplasty for obstructive sleep apnea.
    Li HY; Lee LA; Fang TJ; Lin WN; Lin WY
    Laryngoscope; 2010 May; 120(5):1069-73. PubMed ID: 20155798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptation of nasometry to Hungarian language and experiences with its clinical application.
    Hirschberg J; Bók S; Juhász M; Trenovszki Z; Votisky P; Hirschberg A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 May; 70(5):785-98. PubMed ID: 16246433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A perceptual study of the influence of pitch on the intelligibility of sung vowels.
    Scotto Di Carlo N; Germain A
    Phonetica; 1985; 42(4):188-97. PubMed ID: 3842773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.