200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17987856)
1. The effects of implant length and diameter prior to and after osseointegration: a 2-D finite element analysis.
Georgiopoulos B; Kalioras K; Provatidis C; Manda M; Koidis P
J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(5):243-56. PubMed ID: 17987856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone adaptation induced by non-passively fitting implant superstructures: a finite element analysis based on in vivo strain measurements.
Winter W; Taylor TD; Karl M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1288-95. PubMed ID: 22167435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Degerliyurt K; Simsek B; Erkmen E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical optimization of implant diameter and length for immediate loading: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
Kong L; Gu Z; Li T; Wu J; Hu K; Liu Y; Zhou H; Liu B
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 19918598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of implant length, diameter, and geometry on stress distribution: a finite element analysis.
Anitua E; Tapia R; Luzuriaga F; Orive G
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Feb; 30(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 20224835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction.
Holmgren EP; Seckinger RJ; Kilgren LM; Mante F
J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 9835834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of clinically relevant factors on the immediate biomechanical surrounding for a series of dental implant designs.
Shunmugasamy VC; Gupta N; Pessoa RS; Janal MN; Coelho PG
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Mar; 133(3):031005. PubMed ID: 21303181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone-implant interface with simulated insertion stress around an immediately loaded dental implant in the anterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lee JS; Cho IH; Kim YS; Heo SJ; Kwon HB; Lim YJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 22442767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of off-axis loading of an anterior maxillary implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Hsu ML; Chen FC; Kao HC; Cheng CK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 17465356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of macro-design of immediately loaded implants on micromotion and stress distribution in surrounding bone using finite element analysis.
Fazel A; Aalai S; Rismanchian M
Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 19667823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Parameters of implant stability measurements based on resonance frequency and damping capacity: a comparative finite element analysis.
Winter W; Möhrle S; Holst S; Karl M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):532-9. PubMed ID: 20556252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
