These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17987879)

  • 1. [Acceptance of the meridol toothbrush by dental hygienists. A questionnaire study].
    Saxer UP; Nittner T; Toutenburg H
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2007; 117(10):1050-8. PubMed ID: 17987879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory evaluations of two toothbrushes for removal of artificial plaque above, around and below the gingival margin.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 2003; 14(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 12619266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Plaque removal efficacy of a prototype manual toothbrush versus an ADA reference manual toothbrush with and without dental floss.
    Terezhalmy GT; Bsoul SA; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Aug; 6(3):1-13. PubMed ID: 16127467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A clinical trial of the meridol toothbrush with conical filaments: evaluation of clinical effectiveness and subjective satisfaction.
    Sgan-Cohen HD; Vered Y
    J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(4):109-13. PubMed ID: 16583594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative plaque removal of three toothbrushes in a nine-period crossover study.
    Terézhalmy GT; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    J Periodontol; 2005 Dec; 76(12):2230-5. PubMed ID: 16332234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The elmex SENSITIVE toothbrush: effect on plaque reduction and subjective satisfaction after two months.
    Sgan-Cohen HD; Livny A; Vered Y
    J Clin Dent; 2008; 19(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 18500156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the Dr. SEDOC and ADA toothbrushes in three independent laboratory procedures.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC; Kang HC
    J Clin Dent; 2004; 15(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 15218714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dental hygienists' evaluation of the usability research study of the Colgate ProClinical A1500 electric toothbrush.
    Hovliaras C; Gatzemeyer J; Jimenez E; Panagakos FS
    J Clin Dent; 2015; 26(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 26054186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness.
    Cugini M; Thompson M; Warren PR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):1-9. PubMed ID: 17091134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One- and 3-minute plaque removal by a battery-powered versus a manual toothbrush.
    Williams K; Ferrante A; Dockter K; Haun J; Biesbrock AR; Bartizek RD
    J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1107-13. PubMed ID: 15455739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to two commercially available power toothbrushes on established plaque and gingivitis.
    Ayad F; Petrone DM; Wachs GN; Mateo LR; Chaknis P; Panagakos F
    J Clin Dent; 2012; 23 Spec No A():A5-10. PubMed ID: 23448082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Thirty-Day Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of the Rowenta, Braun and Sonicare Powered Toothbrushes and a Manual Toothbrush.
    Yankell SL; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(4):120-3. PubMed ID: 26630722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative plaque removal efficacy of two new powered toothbrushes and a manual toothbrush.
    Ghassemi A; Vorwerk L; Hooper W; Patel V; Milleman JL; Milleman KR
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 25122975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design.
    Warren P; Thompson M; Cugini M
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 17508624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of two different toothbrush heads on a sonic power toothbrush compared to a manual toothbrush on established gingivitis and plaque.
    Nathoo S; Mateo LR; Chaknis P; Kemp JH; Gatzemeyer J; Morrison BM; Panagakos F
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(4):65-70. PubMed ID: 26054181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blinded clinical evaluation of a new manual toothbrush.
    Harpenau L; Meyers G; Lyon C; Chambers D; Lundergan W
    J Clin Dent; 2006; 17(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 16838873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A single-brushing study to compare plaque removal efficacy of a new power brush to an ADA reference manual toothbrush.
    Klukowska M; Grender JM; Timm H
    Am J Dent; 2012 Sep; 25 Spec No A(A):10A-13A. PubMed ID: 23248893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The electric toothbrush: analysis of filaments under stereomicroscope.
    Checchi L; Farina E; Felice P; Montevecchi M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 31(8):639-42. PubMed ID: 15257741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinical study comparing the supragingival plaque and gingivitis efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to a commercially available manual flat-trim toothbrush.
    Nathoo S; Mankodi S; Mateo LR; Chaknis P; Panagakos F
    J Clin Dent; 2012; 23 Spec No A():A11-6. PubMed ID: 23448083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Plaque and gingivitis reduction in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances-comparison of toothbrushes and interdental cleaning aids. A 6-month clinical single-blind trial.
    Kossack C; Jost-Brinkmann PG
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Jan; 66(1):20-38. PubMed ID: 15711898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.