253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17990627)
1. Peer review at NIH.
Osthus RC
Physiologist; 2007 Oct; 50(5):185, 187. PubMed ID: 17990627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Revamp for NIH grants.
Wadman M
Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7182):1035. PubMed ID: 18305502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A metareview at the NIH.
Nat Med; 2008 Apr; 14(4):351. PubMed ID: 18391922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. NIH weighs peer review changes.
Lang L
Gastroenterology; 2008 Feb; 134(2):380. PubMed ID: 18242202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review reviewed.
Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7159):115. PubMed ID: 17851475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Growing pains for NIH grant review.
Bonetta L
Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16751088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. NIH responds to critics on peer review.
Wadman M
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):835. PubMed ID: 18548033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer review at National Institutes of Health: small steps forward.
Johnston SC; Hauser SL
Ann Neurol; 2008 Nov; 64(5):A15-7. PubMed ID: 19067350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. NIH: grants revamp needs grounding in evidence.
Hannun YA
Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Shorter NIH grant form launches.
Wadman M
Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7277):12-3. PubMed ID: 20054365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. NIH peer review: time for some changes.
Nat Biotechnol; 1998 May; 16(5):395. PubMed ID: 9592372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cautious welcome to NIH peer review reforms.
Gavaghan H
Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):269. PubMed ID: 8183356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer review at NIH: a conversation with CSR director Toni Scarpa.
Scarpa T
Physiologist; 2010 Jun; 53(3):65, 67-9. PubMed ID: 20550006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Grant applications swamp agency.
Wadman M
Nature; 2009 Jun; 459(7248):763. PubMed ID: 19516308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research funding: peer review at NIH.
Scarpa T
Science; 2006 Jan; 311(5757):41. PubMed ID: 16400135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Italy outsources peer review to NIH.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2009 Jun; 459(7249):900. PubMed ID: 19536229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. NIH budget. Peer review under stress.
Miller G; Couzin J
Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5823):358-9. PubMed ID: 17446364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Shortening of NIH RO1 grant applications: your response is important.
Nairn RS; Sweasy JB
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jan; 6(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17157082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review. NIH urged to focus on new ideas, new applicants.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5867):1169. PubMed ID: 18309051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying?
Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Mar; 16(3):390. PubMed ID: 18339262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
