These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17991118)

  • 1. Pap smear screening history of women with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
    Pak SC; Martens M; Bekkers R; Crandon AJ; Land R; Nicklin JL; Perrin LC; Obermair A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Dec; 47(6):504-7. PubMed ID: 17991118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A longitudinal Swedish study on screening for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: evidence of effectiveness and overtreatment.
    Gunnell AS; Ylitalo N; Sandin S; Sparén P; Adami HO; Ripatti S
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2641-8. PubMed ID: 18086769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The pap-smear history of women with invasive cervical squamous carcinoma. A case-control study from Sweden.
    Andersson-Ellström A; Seidal T; Grannas M; Hagmar B
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Mar; 79(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10716304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Papanicolaou smear history and diagnosis of invasive cervical carcinoma among members of a large prepaid health plan.
    Sung HY; Kearney KA; Miller M; Kinney W; Sawaya GF; Hiatt RA
    Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2283-9. PubMed ID: 10820350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
    van der Aa MA; Schutter EM; Looijen-Salamon M; Martens JE; Siesling S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after three consecutive negative Pap smears.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
    J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 14738657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sentinel Pap smears in 261 invasive cervical cancer patients in Italy.
    Igidbashian S; Maggioni A; Casadio C; Boveri S; Cristoforoni P; Sideri M
    Vaccine; 2009 May; 27 Suppl 1():A34-8. PubMed ID: 19480959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma relative to squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the United States--a 24-year population-based study.
    Smith HO; Tiffany MF; Qualls CR; Key CR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Aug; 78(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 10926787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
    Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of causes of increased incidence of cervical cancer in Slovenia.
    Smrkolj S; Rakar S; Mozina A; Erzen M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Dec; 117(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 15541860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cytological screening history of patients with early invasive cervical cancer.
    Turner MJ; Keane DP; Flannelly GM; Lenehan PM; Murphy JF; Foley ME
    Ir Med J; 1990 Jun; 83(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 2202697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os].
    Rooker D; Baalbergen A; Helmerhorst TJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Diagnosis and treatment of invasive cervical cancer in Cambodia (apropos of 35 cases)].
    Monchy D; Lieng CR; Kruy LS; Kahler K; Eav S
    Bull Soc Pathol Exot; 2005 Sep; 98(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 16267957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A project to improve the screening rate of pap smear for cervical cancer].
    Lin HH; Chen SH; Jeng SY; Chen HM
    Hu Li Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 54(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 17340549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improvement in protection against adenocarcinoma of the cervix resulting from participation in cervical screening.
    Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):336-41. PubMed ID: 14681940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
    Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
    East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of biological behavior between early-stage adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Fregnani JH; Soares FA; Novik PR; Lopes A; Latorre MR
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Feb; 136(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 17125903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The cytological screening turned out effective also for adenocarcinoma: a population-based case-control study in Trento, Italy.
    Crocetti E; Battisti L; Betta A; Palma PD; Paci E; Piffer S; Pojer A; Polla E; Zappa M
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Dec; 16(6):564-7. PubMed ID: 18090131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.