335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17991118)
1. Pap smear screening history of women with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
Pak SC; Martens M; Bekkers R; Crandon AJ; Land R; Nicklin JL; Perrin LC; Obermair A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Dec; 47(6):504-7. PubMed ID: 17991118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A longitudinal Swedish study on screening for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: evidence of effectiveness and overtreatment.
Gunnell AS; Ylitalo N; Sandin S; Sparén P; Adami HO; Ripatti S
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2641-8. PubMed ID: 18086769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The pap-smear history of women with invasive cervical squamous carcinoma. A case-control study from Sweden.
Andersson-Ellström A; Seidal T; Grannas M; Hagmar B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Mar; 79(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10716304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Papanicolaou smear history and diagnosis of invasive cervical carcinoma among members of a large prepaid health plan.
Sung HY; Kearney KA; Miller M; Kinney W; Sawaya GF; Hiatt RA
Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2283-9. PubMed ID: 10820350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
van der Aa MA; Schutter EM; Looijen-Salamon M; Martens JE; Siesling S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after three consecutive negative Pap smears.
Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 14738657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sentinel Pap smears in 261 invasive cervical cancer patients in Italy.
Igidbashian S; Maggioni A; Casadio C; Boveri S; Cristoforoni P; Sideri M
Vaccine; 2009 May; 27 Suppl 1():A34-8. PubMed ID: 19480959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma relative to squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the United States--a 24-year population-based study.
Smith HO; Tiffany MF; Qualls CR; Key CR
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Aug; 78(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 10926787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of causes of increased incidence of cervical cancer in Slovenia.
Smrkolj S; Rakar S; Mozina A; Erzen M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Dec; 117(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 15541860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cytological screening history of patients with early invasive cervical cancer.
Turner MJ; Keane DP; Flannelly GM; Lenehan PM; Murphy JF; Foley ME
Ir Med J; 1990 Jun; 83(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 2202697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os].
Rooker D; Baalbergen A; Helmerhorst TJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Diagnosis and treatment of invasive cervical cancer in Cambodia (apropos of 35 cases)].
Monchy D; Lieng CR; Kruy LS; Kahler K; Eav S
Bull Soc Pathol Exot; 2005 Sep; 98(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 16267957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A project to improve the screening rate of pap smear for cervical cancer].
Lin HH; Chen SH; Jeng SY; Chen HM
Hu Li Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 54(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 17340549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improvement in protection against adenocarcinoma of the cervix resulting from participation in cervical screening.
Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):336-41. PubMed ID: 14681940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of biological behavior between early-stage adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Fregnani JH; Soares FA; Novik PR; Lopes A; Latorre MR
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Feb; 136(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 17125903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The cytological screening turned out effective also for adenocarcinoma: a population-based case-control study in Trento, Italy.
Crocetti E; Battisti L; Betta A; Palma PD; Paci E; Piffer S; Pojer A; Polla E; Zappa M
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Dec; 16(6):564-7. PubMed ID: 18090131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
