294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17991457)
1. Timbre discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners under different noise conditions.
Emiroglu S; Kollmeier B
Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():199-207. PubMed ID: 17991457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Rhebergen KS; Lyzenga J; Dreschler WA; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Freyaldenhoven MC; Plyler PN; Thelin JW; Hedrick MS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 17675593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mismatch negativity (MMN) objectively reflects timbre discrimination thresholds in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
Rahne T; Plontke SK; Wagner L
Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 1586():143-51. PubMed ID: 25152464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Timbre discrimination in cochlear implant users and normal hearing subjects using cross-faded synthetic tones.
Rahne T; Böhme L; Götze G
J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Aug; 199(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 21664377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
Hagerman B
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Smits C; Houtgast T
Int J Audiol; 2007 Mar; 46(3):134-44. PubMed ID: 17365067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Masking of spondees by interrupted noise in hearing-impaired listeners.
Punch JL
J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(6):245-52. PubMed ID: 681196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid.
Plomp R; Duquesnoy AJ
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of auditory nonlinearity for listeners with different hearing losses using temporal masking and categorical loudness scaling.
Jürgens T; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Ewert SD
Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):177-91. PubMed ID: 21669269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech.
Glasberg BR; Moore BC
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1989; 32():1-25. PubMed ID: 2711118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of noise and distortion on speech quality judgments in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Harvey LO
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1150-64. PubMed ID: 17672661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Amos NE; Humes LE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Broadband auditory stream segregation by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
Valentine S; Lentz JJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1341-52. PubMed ID: 18664686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spectral-peak selection in spectral-shape discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Lentz JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):945-56. PubMed ID: 16938982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modified rhyme test and synthetic sentence identification test scores of normal and hearing-impaired subjects listening in multitalker noise.
Miner R; Danhauer JL
J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 2(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 977431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two experiments on subtle mid-frequency hearing loss and its influence on word discrimination in noise-exposed listeners.
Humes LE; Schwartz DM; Bess FH
Audiology; 1979; 18(4):307-19. PubMed ID: 475663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
