294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17991457)
21. Binaural speech discrimination under noise in hearing-impaired listeners.
Kumar KV; Rao AB
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1988 Oct; 59(10):932-6. PubMed ID: 3190620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The psychoacoustics of profound hearing impairment.
Rosen S; Faulkner A; Smith DA
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():16-22. PubMed ID: 2356723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reaction time to 1- and 4-kHz tones as a function of sensation level in listeners with normal hearing.
Epstein M; Florentine M
Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 16825891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
Strelcyk O; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement.
DiGiovanni JJ; Nelson PB; Schlauch RS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1121-35. PubMed ID: 16411801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effect of extending high-frequency bandwidth on the acceptable noise level (ANL) of hearing-impaired listeners.
Johnson E; Ricketts T; Hornsby B
Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(6):353-62. PubMed ID: 19925343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Interference and enhancement effects on interaural time discrimination and level discrimination in listeners with normal hearing and those with hearing loss.
Smith-Olinde L; Besing J; Koehnke J
Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 15248807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Measuring the effects of reverberation and noise on sentence intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
George EL; Goverts ST; Festen JM; Houtgast T
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1429-39. PubMed ID: 20689027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
Hedrick MS; Younger MS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Speech recognition threshold in noise: effects of hearing loss, frequency response, and speech materials.
Van Tasell DJ; Yanz JL
J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Sep; 30(3):377-86. PubMed ID: 3669644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Loudness and the acoustic reflex: cochlear-impaired listeners.
Keith RW
J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 511665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Measuring timbre discrimination with cross-faded synthetic tones.
Rahne T; Rasinski C; Neumann K
J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Jun; 189(2):176-9. PubMed ID: 20350567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Auditory intensity discrimination as a function of level-rove and tone duration in normal-hearing and impaired subjects: the "mid-level hump" revisited.
Pienkowski M; Hagerman B
Hear Res; 2009 Jul; 253(1-2):107-15. PubMed ID: 19345257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.
Wilson RH; McArdle RA; Smith SL
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 17675590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Modelling the speech reception threshold in non-stationary noise in hearing-impaired listeners as a function of level.
Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; de Laat JA; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2010 Nov; 49(11):856-65. PubMed ID: 20936997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The French digit triplet test: a hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise.
Jansen S; Luts H; Wagener KC; Frachet B; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2010 May; 49(5):378-87. PubMed ID: 20380611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Spectral loudness summation as a function of duration for hearing-impaired listeners.
Verhey JL; Anweiler AK; Hohmann V
Int J Audiol; 2006 May; 45(5):287-94. PubMed ID: 16717019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The controversial relationship between loudness discomfort levels and acoustic reflex thresholds.
Ritter R; Johnson RM; Northern JL
J Am Audiol Soc; 1979; 4(4):123-31. PubMed ID: 422423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of age, age-related hearing loss, and contralateral cafeteria noise on the discrimination of small frequency changes: psychoacoustic and electrophysiological measures.
Bertoli S; Smurzynski J; Probst R
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Sep; 6(3):207-22. PubMed ID: 16027962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
