These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17991457)

  • 41. The effect of temporal waveform shape on spectral discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Leek MR; Summers V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):2074-82. PubMed ID: 8227749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of signal duration on categorical loudness scaling in normal and in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Garnier S; Micheyl C; Berger-Vachon C; Collet L
    Audiology; 1999; 38(4):196-201. PubMed ID: 10431905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Influence of implantable hearing aids and neuroprosthesison music perception.
    Rahne T; Böhme L; Götze G
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():404590. PubMed ID: 22645422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. On the relations of intensity jnd's to loudness and neural noise.
    Zwislocki JJ; Jordan HN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):772-80. PubMed ID: 3958318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Binaural loudness matches in unilaterally impaired listeners.
    Zeng FG; Turner CW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):565-83. PubMed ID: 1775657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Relations and variability of the stapedial reflex threshold and psychoacoustic discomfort threshold].
    Prosser S; Rosignoli M
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1991; 11(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 1776435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Test of auditory comprehension: a comparison of hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Brown JR
    J Aud Res; 1986 Jul; 26(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 3680146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Part- vs full-list performance on the NST by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults.
    Danhauer JL; Brink TJ
    J Aud Res; 1985 Jul; 25(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 3842838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Performance on a nonsense syllable test for normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Danhauer JL; Hiller SM; Edgerton BJ
    J Aud Res; 1984 Jul; 24(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 6545536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of spectral shaping and content on loudness discomfort.
    Bentler RA; Nelson JA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Oct; 12(9):462-70. PubMed ID: 11699817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A method for relating loudness-matching and intensity-discrimination data.
    Schlauch RS; Wier CC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Mar; 30(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 3560891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Frequency modulation detection by normally hearing and profoundly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Dec; 30(4):558-63. PubMed ID: 3695448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Evaluation of the effect of noise at 70 dB].
    Tarasenko GI; Petlenko IA
    Kosm Biol Aviakosm Med; 1983; 17(3):78-81. PubMed ID: 6876725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Discrimination of Gain Increments in Speech-Shaped Noises.
    Caswell-Midwinter B; Whitmer WM
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216518820220. PubMed ID: 30803400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of noise and reverberation on the precedence effect in listeners with normal hearing and impaired hearing.
    Roberts RA; Koehnke J; Besing J
    Am J Audiol; 2003 Dec; 12(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 14964325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of intensity and location on sound location discrimination in macaque monkeys.
    Recanzone GH; Beckerman NS
    Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 198(1-2):116-24. PubMed ID: 15567608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Detection, loudness, and discrimination of five-component tonal complexes differing in crest factor.
    Preece JP; Wilson RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):166-71. PubMed ID: 3411044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Gap detection in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Fitzgibbons PJ; Wightman FL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Sep; 72(3):761-5. PubMed ID: 7130534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Psychoacoustic correlates of individual noise sensitivity.
    Ellermeier W; Eigenstetter M; Zimmer K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1464-73. PubMed ID: 11325118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Noise-intensity discrimination as measured by up-down psychophysical methods.
    Moschetto CF; Bernstein RS; Raab DH
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 7345057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.