239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17991621)
1. Initial comparison of inverse optimization, modified peripheral technique, and geometric optimization as real-time intraoperative computer planning options for permanent seed implantation of the prostate.
Raben A; Sammons S; Sim S; Chen H; Hanlon A; Sarkar A; Donavanik V; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Benge B; Glick A; Jacob D; Koprowski P
Brachytherapy; 2007; 6(4):238-45. PubMed ID: 17991621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of anatomy-based dwell position and inverse optimization in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison to a conventional cylindrical dwell position, geometric optimization, and dose-point optimization.
Yoshioka Y; Nishimura T; Kamata M; Harada H; Kanazawa K; Fuji H; Murayama S
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jun; 75(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 15890425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Favorable toxicity and biochemical control using real-time inverse optimization technique for prostate brachytherapy.
Raben A; Rusthoven KE; Sarkar A; Glick A; Benge B; Jacobs D; Raben D
Brachytherapy; 2009; 8(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 19213608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraoperative real-time planned conformal prostate brachytherapy: post-implantation dosimetric outcome and clinical implications.
Zelefsky MJ; Yamada Y; Cohen GN; Sharma N; Shippy AM; Fridman D; Zaider M
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Aug; 84(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 17692978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors predicting for urinary incontinence after prostate brachytherapy.
McElveen TL; Waterman FM; Kim H; Dicker AP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Aug; 59(5):1395-404. PubMed ID: 15275725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Five-year outcome of intraoperative conformal permanent I-125 interstitial implantation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Zelefsky MJ; Yamada Y; Cohen GN; Shippy A; Chan H; Fridman D; Zaider M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Jan; 67(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 17189063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Toward a dynamic real-time intraoperative permanent prostate brachytherapy methodology.
Potters L; Calguaru E; Thornton KB; Jackson T; Huang D
Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 15062140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraoperative conformal optimization for transperineal prostate implantation using magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.
Zelefsky MJ; Cohen G; Zakian KL; Dyke J; Koutcher JA; Hricak H; Schwartz L; Zaider M
Cancer J; 2000; 6(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 11038145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of intraoperative edema during transperineal permanent prostate brachytherapy on computer-optimized and preimplant planning techniques.
Yamada Y; Potters L; Zaider M; Cohen G; Venkatraman E; Zelefsky MJ
Am J Clin Oncol; 2003 Oct; 26(5):e130-5. PubMed ID: 14528087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is there a role for postimplant dosimetry after real-time dynamic permanent prostate brachytherapy?
Potters L; Calugaru E; Jassal A; Presser J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(4):1014-9. PubMed ID: 16682144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of inverse planning simulated annealing and geometrical optimization for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Hsu IC; Lessard E; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15533807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and physical determinants for toxicity of 125-I seed prostate brachytherapy.
Wust P; von Borczyskowski DW; Henkel T; Rosner C; Graf R; Tilly W; Budach V; Felix R; Kahmann F
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Oct; 73(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 15465144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: reduced morbidity with an intraoperative brachytherapy planning technique and supplemental intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Zelefsky MJ; Nedelka MA; Arican ZL; Yamada Y; Cohen GN; Shippy AM; Park JJ; Zaider M
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18299108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anatomy-based inverse planning simulated annealing optimization in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: significant dosimetric advantage over other optimization techniques.
Jacob D; Raben A; Sarkar A; Grimm J; Simpson L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Nov; 72(3):820-7. PubMed ID: 18455325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of dosimetric and biologic effective dose parameters for prostate and urethra using 131 Cs and 125 I for prostate permanent implant brachytherapy.
Sahgal A; Jabbari S; Chen J; Pickett B; Roach M; Weinberg V; Hsu IC; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Sep; 72(1):247-54. PubMed ID: 18722275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors predicting for urinary morbidity following 125iodine transperineal prostate brachytherapy.
Williams SG; Millar JL; Duchesne GM; Dally MJ; Royce PL; Snow RM
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Oct; 73(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 15465143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The nature and extent of urinary morbidity in relation to prostate brachytherapy urethral dosimetry.
Neill M; Studer G; Le L; McLean M; Yeung I; Pond G; Crook JM
Brachytherapy; 2007; 6(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 17681239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of intraoperatively built custom linked seeds versus loose seed gun applicator technique using real-time intraoperative planning for permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Zauls AJ; Ashenafi MS; Onicescu G; Clarke HS; Marshall DT
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Nov; 81(4):1010-6. PubMed ID: 20888132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of the radial function on I-125 seeds used for permanent prostate implantation.
Pickett B; Pouliot J
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 15324917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
