116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17993400)
1. An atlas improves interobserver agreement regarding application of the ISCD vertebral body exclusion criteria.
Hansen KE; Binkley N; Blank RD; Krueger DC; Christian RC; Malone DG; Baim S
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(4):359-64. PubMed ID: 17993400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver reproducibility of criteria for vertebral body exclusion.
Hansen KE; Binkley N; Christian R; Vallarta-Ast N; Krueger D; Drezner MK; Blank RD
J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Mar; 20(3):501-8. PubMed ID: 15746996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DXA-generated Z-scores and T-scores may differ substantially and significantly in young adults.
Carey JJ; Delaney MF; Love TE; Richmond BJ; Cromer BA; Miller PD; Manilla-McIntosh M; Lewis SA; Thomas CL; Licata AA
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(4):351-8. PubMed ID: 17662630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. OST risk index and calcaneus bone densitometry in osteoporosis diagnosis.
Pérez-Castrillón JL; Sagredo MG; Conde R; del Pino-Montes J; de Luis D
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 17662631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonprogression of vertebral area or bone mineral content on DXA does not predict compression fractures.
Morgan SL; Lopez-Ben R; Nunnally N; Burroughs L; Desmond R
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):261-4. PubMed ID: 16931342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry diagnostic discordance between Z-scores and T-scores in young adults.
Carey JJ; Delaney MF; Love TE; Cromer BA; Miller PD; Richmond BJ; Manilla-McIntosh M; Lewis SA; Thomas CL; Licata AA
J Clin Densitom; 2009; 12(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 19195620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a Swedish T-score reference population for women causes a two-fold increase in the amount of postmenopausal Swedish patients that fulfill the WHO criteria for osteoporosis.
Ribom EL; Ljunggren O; Mallmin H
J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 18280191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exclusion of focal vertebral artifacts from spine bone densitometry and fracture prediction: a comparison of expert physicians, three computer algorithms, and the minimum vertebra.
Tsang JF; Leslie WD
J Bone Miner Res; 2007 Jun; 22(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 17371161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Skeletal sites for osteoporosis diagnosis: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions.
Hans D; Downs RW; Duboeuf F; Greenspan S; Jankowski LG; Kiebzak GM; Petak SM;
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 16731427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis.
de Klerk G; van der Velde D; van der Palen J; van Bergeijk L; Hegeman JH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18825395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of increasing vertebral marrow fat content on BMD measurement, T-Score status and fracture risk prediction by DXA.
Blake GM; Griffith JF; Yeung DK; Leung PC; Fogelman I
Bone; 2009 Mar; 44(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 19059505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of vertebral endplate signal (modic) changes in the lumbar spine: the Nordic Modic Consensus Group classification.
Jensen TS; Sorensen JS; Kjaer P
Acta Radiol; 2007 Sep; 48(7):748-54. PubMed ID: 17729006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of the lowest vertebral body T-score to diagnose lumbar osteoporosis in men: is "cherry picking" appropriate?
Hansen KE; Vallarta-Ast N; Krueger D; Gangnon R; Drezner MK; Binkley N
J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 15618597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated assessment of exclusion criteria for DXA lumbar spine scans.
Barden HS; Markwardt P; Payne R; Hawkins B; Frank M; Faulkner KG
J Clin Densitom; 2003; 6(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 14716054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Executive summary of the 2013 International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference on bone densitometry.
Schousboe JT; Shepherd JA; Bilezikian JP; Baim S
J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(4):455-66. PubMed ID: 24183638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evolution of bone mineral density after percutaneous kyphoplasty in fresh osteoporotic vertebral body fractures and adjacent vertebrae along with sagittal spine alignment.
Korovessis P; Zacharatos S; Repantis T; Michael A; Karachalios D
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 18525491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in a group of healthy Moroccan men.
El Maghraoui A; Ghazi M; Gassim S; Mounach A; Ghozlani I; Nouijai A; Achemlal L; Bezza A; Dehhaoui M
Bone; 2009 May; 44(5):965-9. PubMed ID: 19168162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. OST risk index with forearm densitometry.
Pfister AK; Helmick KP; Saville PD; Welch CA; Emmett MK
J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(4):590-1; author reply 592. PubMed ID: 18456532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone density comparisons in male competitive road cyclists and untrained controls.
Smathers AM; Bemben MG; Bemben DA
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2009 Feb; 41(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 19127198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The history of bone densitometry.
Miller PD
Bone; 2017 Nov; 104():4-6. PubMed ID: 28587786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
