157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17994515)
1. Use of safety devices and the prevention of percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers.
Valls V; Lozano MS; Yánez R; Martínez MJ; Pascual F; Lloret J; Ruiz JA
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 28(12):1352-60. PubMed ID: 17994515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using an intravenous catheter system to prevent needlestick injury.
Sossai D; Puro V; Chiappatoli L; Dagnino G; Odone B; Polimeri A; Ruzza L; Palombo P; Fuscoe MS; Scognamiglio P
Nurs Stand; 2010 Mar 24-30; 24(29):42-6. PubMed ID: 20426370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comprehensive approach to percutaneous injury prevention during phlebotomy: results of a multicenter study, 1993-1995.
Alvarado-Ramy F; Beltrami EM; Short LJ; Srivastava PU; Henry K; Mendelson M; Gerberding JL; Delclos GL; Campbell S; Solomon R; Fahrner R; Culver DH; Bell D; Cardo DM; Chamberland ME
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 24(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 12602691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of safety devices for preventing percutaneous injuries among health-care workers during phlebotomy procedures--Minneapolis-St. Paul, New York City, and San Francisco, 1993-1995.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1997 Jan; 46(2):21-5. PubMed ID: 9011778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of safety-engineered devices by healthcare workers for intravenous and/or phlebotomy procedures in healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ballout RA; Diab B; Harb AC; Tarabay R; Khamassi S; Akl EA
BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Sep; 16():458. PubMed ID: 27581947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of implementing safety-engineered devices on percutaneous injury epidemiology.
Sohn S; Eagan J; Sepkowitz KA; Zuccotti G
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 25(7):536-42. PubMed ID: 15301024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of safety devices for preventing percutaneous injuries related to phlebotomy procedures in health care workers.
Rogues AM; Verdun-Esquer C; Buisson-Valles I; Laville MF; Lashéras A; Sarrat A; Beaudelle H; Brochard P; Gachie JP
Am J Infect Control; 2004 Dec; 32(8):441-4. PubMed ID: 15573049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Safety-Engineered Devices.
Fukuda H; Moriwaki K
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 37(9):1012-21. PubMed ID: 27226284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a safety resheathable winged steel needle for prevention of percutaneous injuries associated with intravascular-access procedures among healthcare workers.
Mendelson MH; Lin-Chen BY; Solomon R; Bailey E; Kogan G; Goldbold J
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 24(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 12602692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Safety-Engineered Devices on the Incidence of Occupational Blood and Body Fluid Exposures Among Healthcare Personnel in an Academic Facility, 2000-2014.
Kanamori H; Weber DJ; DiBiase LM; Pitman KL; Consoli SA; Hill J; Sickbert-Bennett EE; Rutala WA
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2016 May; 37(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 26856246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized prospective study of the impact of three needleless intravenous systems on needlestick injury rates.
L'Ecuyer PB; Schwab EO; Iademarco E; Barr N; Aton EA; Fraser VJ
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1996 Dec; 17(12):803-8. PubMed ID: 8985767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Evaluation of safety devices for preventing percutaneous injuries among health-care workers during phlebotomy procedures--Minneapolis-St Paul, New York City, and San Francisco, 1993-1995.
JAMA; 1997 Feb; 277(6):449-50. PubMed ID: 9020257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of the introduction of an engineered sharps injury prevention device on the percutaneous injury rate in healthcare workers.
Azar-Cavanagh M; Burdt P; Green-McKenzie J
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 28(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 17265397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of safety-engineered devices in reducing sharp object injuries.
Lu Y; Senthilselvan A; Joffe AM; Beach J
Occup Med (Lond); 2015 Jan; 65(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25344960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Needlestick injuries in a major teaching hospital: the worthwhile effect of hospital-wide replacement of conventional hollow-bore needles.
Whitby M; McLaws ML; Slater K
Am J Infect Control; 2008 Apr; 36(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 18371513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of education and problem solving work group on nursing practices to prevent needlestick and sharp injury.
Srikrajang J; Pochamarn C; Chittreecheur J; Apisarnthanarak A; Danchaivijitr S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Dec; 88 Suppl 10():S115-9. PubMed ID: 16850654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A review of needle-protective devices to prevent sharps injuries.
Trim JC
Br J Nurs; 2004 Feb 12-25; 13(3):144, 146-53. PubMed ID: 14997076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?
Orenstein R; Reynolds L; Karabaic M; Lamb A; Markowitz SM; Wong ES
Am J Infect Control; 1995 Dec; 23(6):344-51. PubMed ID: 8821109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Issues in understanding the impact of the Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act on hospital sharps injuries.
Phillips EK; Conaway M; Parker G; Perry J; Jagger J
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 34(9):935-9. PubMed ID: 23917907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Needlestick injury rates according to different types of safety-engineered devices: results of a French multicenter study.
Tosini W; Ciotti C; Goyer F; Lolom I; L'Hériteau F; Abiteboul D; Pellissier G; Bouvet E
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 31(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 20175681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
