149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17994899)
21. Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy for Measuring Chromatin Complex Structure and Dynamics.
Cherubini A; Zippo A
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1480():143-52. PubMed ID: 27659982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantification of protein interaction in living cells by two-photon spectral imaging with fluorescent protein fluorescence resonance energy transfer pair devoid of acceptor bleed-through.
Kim J; Li X; Kang MS; Im KB; Genovesio A; Grailhe R
Cytometry A; 2012 Feb; 81(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 22076866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Optical section structured illumination-based Förster resonance energy transfer imaging.
Liu Z; Luo Z; Chen H; Yin A; Sun H; Zhuang Z; Chen T
Cytometry A; 2022 Mar; 101(3):264-272. PubMed ID: 34490985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Perrin and Förster unified: Dual-laser triple-polarization FRET (3polFRET) for interactions at the Förster-distance and beyond.
Ungvári T; Gogolák P; Bagdány M; Damjanovich L; Bene L
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2016 Apr; 1863(4):703-16. PubMed ID: 26854711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Application of phasor plot and autofluorescence correction for study of heterogeneous cell population.
Szmacinski H; Toshchakov V; Lakowicz JR
J Biomed Opt; 2014 Apr; 19(4):046017. PubMed ID: 24770662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Probing protein-protein Interactions with FRET-FLIM.
Bücherl C; Aker J; de Vries S; Borst JW
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 655():389-99. PubMed ID: 20734275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Estimating the distance separating fluorescent protein FRET pairs.
Vogel SS; van der Meer BW; Blank PS
Methods; 2014 Mar; 66(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 23811334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reliable measurement of the FRET sensitized-quenching transition factor for FRET quantification in living cells.
Zhang J; Zhang L; Chai L; Yang F; Du M; Chen T
Micron; 2016 Sep; 88():7-15. PubMed ID: 27239984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accurate single-pair Förster resonant energy transfer through combination of pulsed interleaved excitation, time correlated single-photon counting, and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.
Rüttinger S; Macdonald R; Krämer B; Koberling F; Roos M; Hildt E
J Biomed Opt; 2006; 11(2):024012. PubMed ID: 16674202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Three-chromophore FRET microscopy to analyze multiprotein interactions in living cells.
Galperin E; Verkhusha VV; Sorkin A
Nat Methods; 2004 Dec; 1(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 15782196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Screening for protein-protein interactions using Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) and fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM).
Margineanu A; Chan JJ; Kelly DJ; Warren SC; Flatters D; Kumar S; Katan M; Dunsby CW; French PM
Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():28186. PubMed ID: 27339025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy (FLIM) as a Tool to Investigate Hypoxia-Induced Protein-Protein Interaction in Living Cells.
Schützhold V; Fandrey J; Prost-Fingerle K
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1742():45-53. PubMed ID: 29330789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. FRET microscopy in the living cell: different approaches, strengths and weaknesses.
Padilla-Parra S; Tramier M
Bioessays; 2012 May; 34(5):369-76. PubMed ID: 22415767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Spectral imaging and linear un-mixing enables improved FRET efficiency with a novel GFP2-YFP FRET pair.
Zimmermann T; Rietdorf J; Girod A; Georget V; Pepperkok R
FEBS Lett; 2002 Nov; 531(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 12417320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Miniature fiber optic spectrometer-based quantitative fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurement in single living cells.
Chai L; Zhang J; Zhang L; Chen T
J Biomed Opt; 2015 Mar; 20(3):037008. PubMed ID: 25793494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Combined bimolecular fluorescence complementation and Forster resonance energy transfer reveals ternary SNARE complex formation in living plant cells.
Kwaaitaal M; Keinath NF; Pajonk S; Biskup C; Panstruga R
Plant Physiol; 2010 Mar; 152(3):1135-47. PubMed ID: 20071602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Using c-Fos/c-Jun as hetero-dimer interaction model to optimize donor to acceptor concentration ratio range for three-filter fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurement.
Wang S; Li KJ; Lin XW; Jiang CZ; Chen DH; Wu Q; Hua ZC
J Microsc; 2012 Oct; 248(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 22971218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. IIem-spFRET: improved Iem-spFRET method for robust FRET measurement.
Zhang J; Lin F; Chai L; Wei L; Chen T
J Biomed Opt; 2016 Oct; 21(10):105003. PubMed ID: 27735016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantitative fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements using fluorescence microscopy.
Gordon GW; Berry G; Liang XH; Levine B; Herman B
Biophys J; 1998 May; 74(5):2702-13. PubMed ID: 9591694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prolonged irradiation of enhanced cyan fluorescent protein or Cerulean can invalidate Forster resonance energy transfer measurements.
Hoffmann B; Zimmer T; Klöcker N; Kelbauskas L; König K; Benndorf K; Biskup C
J Biomed Opt; 2008; 13(3):031205. PubMed ID: 18601529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
