253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17996923)
1. False incoagulable PT-INR results in oral anticoagulant therapy.
Redaelli R; Corno AR; Somaini MG; Gechtman C; Caimi TM; Baudo F; Morra E
Thromb Res; 2008; 122(1):137-9. PubMed ID: 17996923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality assurance program for whole blood prothrombin time-international normalized ratio point-of-care monitors used for patient self-testing to control oral anticoagulation.
Tripodi A; Bressi C; Carpenedo M; Chantarangkul V; Clerici M; Mannucci PM
Thromb Res; 2004; 113(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15081563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sample carryover in PT-INR determination is it an issue in Oral Anticoagulant Therapy control?
Corno AR; Redaelli R; Caimi TM; Mostarda G; Caruso R; Morra E
Thromb Res; 2011 Mar; 127(3):279-81. PubMed ID: 21129767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Oral anticoagulant monitoring by laboratory or near-patient testing: what a clinician should be aware of.
Tripodi A; Breukink-Engbers WG; van den Besselaar AM
Semin Vasc Med; 2003 Aug; 3(3):243-54. PubMed ID: 15199457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rebuttal to: strong lupus anticoagulant can influence the prothrombin time INR falsifying the follow up of oral anticoagulation.
Bailleul E; Van Vaerenbergh K; Lust A
Thromb Haemost; 2005 Sep; 94(3):687; author reply 688. PubMed ID: 16268495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of frozen plasma calibrants for enhanced standardization of the international normalized ratio (INR): a multi-center study.
Adcock DM; Johnston M
Thromb Haemost; 2002 Jan; 87(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 11848460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Has the time arrived to replace the quick prothrombin time test for monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy?
Jackson CM; Esnouf MP
Clin Chem; 2005 Mar; 51(3):483-5. PubMed ID: 15738512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison and evaluation of a Point-of-care device (CoaguChek XS) to Owren-type prothrombin time assay for monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy with warfarin.
Wieloch M; Hillarp A; Strandberg K; Nilsson C; Svensson PJ
Thromb Res; 2009 Jul; 124(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 19423152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A modified method of prothrombin time/International Normalised Ratio determination in capillary blood and monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy.
Berkovsky A; Sergeeva EV; Suvorov AV; Uljavova IS; Kachalova ND; Klimovich LG; Samsonova NN; Kozlov AA
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(10):1214-7. PubMed ID: 17032133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The factors that influence the consistency of international normalized ratio of prothrombin time].
Su W; Ren FQ
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2001 Apr; 23(2):196-8. PubMed ID: 12905903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Point-of-care monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy in children. Comparison of the CoaguChek XS system with venous INR and venous INR using an International Reference Thromboplastin preparation (rTF/95).
Greenway A; Ignjatovic V; Summerhayes R; Newall F; Burgess J; DeRosa L; Monagle P
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jul; 102(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 19572081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Agreement of a new whole-blood PT/INR test using capillary samples with plasma INR determinations.
Boehlen F; Reber G; de Moerloose P
Thromb Res; 2005; 115(1-2):131-4. PubMed ID: 15567464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Review article: the prothrombin time test as a measure of bleeding risk and prognosis in liver disease.
Tripodi A; Caldwell SH; Hoffman M; Trotter JF; Sanyal AJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Jul; 26(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 17593061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of the CoaguChek XS for point-of-care international normalized ratio (INR) measurement in children requiring warfarin.
Bauman ME; Black KL; Massicotte MP; Bauman ML; Kuhle S; Howlett-Clyne S; Cembrowski GS; Bajzar L
Thromb Haemost; 2008 Jun; 99(6):1097-103. PubMed ID: 18521514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mathematical derivative applied to international normalised ratio and analytical variations in oral anticoagulant therapy control.
Introcaso G; Cuboni A; Ratto A; Foieni F
Haemostasis; 2000; 30(6):281-9. PubMed ID: 11356996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The perioperative management of warfarin therapy.
Ansell JE
Arch Intern Med; 2003 Apr; 163(8):881-3. PubMed ID: 12719195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The INR: a perspective.
Smith RE
Semin Thromb Hemost; 1997; 23(6):547-9. PubMed ID: 9469628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Standardization of the INR: how good is your laboratory's INR and can it be improved?
Favaloro EJ; Adcock DM
Semin Thromb Hemost; 2008 Oct; 34(7):593-603. PubMed ID: 19085760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Quick and Owren prothrombin time methods for oral anticoagulant therapy do not agree well using the International Normalized Ratio (INR) units.
Horsti J
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2003; 63(6):455-6. PubMed ID: 14594327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The significance of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) for oral anticoagulant therapy.
van den Besselaar AM
J Int Fed Clin Chem; 1991 Sep; 3(4):146-53. PubMed ID: 20821873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
