These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17996923)

  • 21. Prothrombin time international normalized ratio monitoring by self-testing.
    Tripodi A
    Curr Opin Hematol; 2004 May; 11(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 15257011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. International Committee for Standardization in Haematology, International Committee on Thrombosis and Haemostasis: ICSH/ICTH recommendations for reporting prothrombin time in oral anticoagulant control.
    Thromb Haemost; 1985 Feb; 53(1):155-6. PubMed ID: 3992515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Problems of the laboratory control of oral anticoagulant treatment.
    Hummel L
    Folia Haematol Int Mag Klin Morphol Blutforsch; 1988; 115(4):529-31. PubMed ID: 2465967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Poor agreement among prothrombin time international normalized ratio methods: comparison of seven commercial reagents.
    Horsti J; Uppa H; Vilpo JA
    Clin Chem; 2005 Mar; 51(3):553-60. PubMed ID: 15665046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Choice of PT-INR instruments in primary health care].
    Stavelin A; Omenås B; Bolann B; Christensen NG; Sandberg S
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Nov; 128(22):2620. PubMed ID: 19023367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Relationship between chromogenic factor X and international normalized ratio differs during early warfarin initiation compared with chronic warfarin administration.
    Rosborough TK; Jacobsen JM; Shepherd MF
    Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2009 Sep; 20(6):433-5. PubMed ID: 19543077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Results of the performance verification of the CoaguChek XS system.
    Plesch W; Wolf T; Breitenbeck N; Dikkeschei LD; Cervero A; Perez PL; van den Besselaar AM
    Thromb Res; 2008; 123(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 18585761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intrahospital correlation of the international normalized ratio.
    Lazo-Langner A; Villa-Márquez R; Hernández-Hernández D; Rojas-Maya S; Piedras J
    Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2009; 15(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 18385150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perioperative management of patients receiving oral anticoagulants.
    Kearon C; Hirsh J
    Arch Intern Med; 2003 Nov; 163(20):2532-3; author reply 2533. PubMed ID: 14609792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparability of the results of PT-INR with local MNPT and APTTR with MNAPTT on different coagulation analyzers in China.
    Peng L; Yan C; Wu X; Nie L
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2009 Jun; 31(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 18510575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. CoaguChek point-of-care testing prothrombin time monitors.
    Braun SL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Oct; 128(4):671-2; author reply 672. PubMed ID: 17924500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Local international normalised ratio (INR) derivation simplified using the European concerted action on anticoagulation (ECAA) prothrombin time/INR line.
    Poller L; Jespersen J
    Thromb Res; 2011 Aug; 128(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 21658749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation of the international normalized ratio (INR) in a new point-of-care system designed for home monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy.
    Plesch W; van den Besselaar AM
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2009 Feb; 31(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 19143869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of quick and owren prothrombin time with regard to the harmonisation of the International Normalised Ratio (INR) system.
    Horsti J
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2002 Apr; 40(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 12059082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The International Normalized Ratio (INR): a review.
    Then KL; Rankin JA
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 1999; 10(1-2):40-2. PubMed ID: 10786468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Performance evaluation of a new small-volume coagulation monitor: the SmartCheck INR system.
    Gardiner C; Longair I; Hills J; Cohen H; Mackie IJ; Machin SJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Mar; 129(3):500-4. PubMed ID: 18285276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality assessment in point-of-care coagulation testing.
    Kitchen DP; Kitchen S; Jennings I; Woods T; Walker I
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 2008 Oct; 34(7):647-53. PubMed ID: 19085765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Extrapolation method: as effective as the conventional methods for INR determination.
    Gupta M; Mohanty S; Saxena R
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 47(2):306. PubMed ID: 16295509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [PT (INR) in extractive dental surgery in patients treated with oral anticoagulants].
    Caldarola F; Tealdi R; Molinatti M
    Minerva Stomatol; 1994 Apr; 43(4):167-9. PubMed ID: 8065287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Native prothrombin as an alternative to prothrombin time determination for monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy.
    Pfäfflin A
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2009; 47(2):242-3. PubMed ID: 19191733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.