These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1799732)
1. Technical considerations for myocardial protection during the course of coronary artery bypass reoperation: the impact of functioning saphenous vein and internal mammary artery grafts. Mills NL; Everson CT; Hockmuth DR J Card Surg; 1991 Mar; 6(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 1799732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Important anatomical and physiological considerations in performance of complex mammary-coronary artery operations. Jones EL; Lattouf O; Lutz JF; King SB Ann Thorac Surg; 1987 May; 43(5):469-77. PubMed ID: 3555366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery. No difference in 1-year occlusion rates and clinical outcome. CABADAS Research Group of the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands. van der Meer J; Hillege HL; van Gilst WH; Brutel de la Rivière A; Dunselman PH; Fidler V; Kootstra GJ; Mulder BJ; Pfisterer M; Lie KI Circulation; 1994 Nov; 90(5):2367-74. PubMed ID: 7955195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Internal mammary artery graft at reoperation: risks, benefits, and methods of preservation. Coltharp WH; Decker MD; Lea JW; Petracek MR; Glassford DM; Thomas CS; Burrus GR; Alford WC; Stoney WS Ann Thorac Surg; 1991 Aug; 52(2):225-8; discussion 229. PubMed ID: 1863143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radial artery bypass grafts have an increased occurrence of angiographically severe stenosis and occlusion compared with left internal mammary arteries and saphenous vein grafts. Khot UN; Friedman DT; Pettersson G; Smedira NG; Li J; Ellis SG Circulation; 2004 May; 109(17):2086-91. PubMed ID: 15123539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flow capacity of internal mammary artery grafts: early restriction and later improvement assessed by Doppler guide wire. Comparison with saphenous vein grafts. Akasaka T; Yoshikawa J; Yoshida K; Maeda K; Hozumi T; Nasu M; Shomura T J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Mar; 25(3):640-7. PubMed ID: 7860908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Internal mammary artery bypass grafting: influence on recurrent angina and survival in 2,100 patients. Acinapura AJ; Rose DM; Jacobowitz IJ; Kramer MD; Robertazzi RR; Feldman J; Zisbrod Z; Cunningham JN Ann Thorac Surg; 1989 Aug; 48(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 2788393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional comparison of coronary bypass grafts of the saphenous vein and internal mammary artery. Myojin K; Weiss G; Mee R; Tucker WY; Kopf G; Collins JJ; Cohn LH J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 May; 79(5):713-7. PubMed ID: 6966016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Excellent patency and growth potential of internal mammary artery grafts in pediatric coronary artery bypass surgery. New evidence for a "live" conduit. Kitamura S; Seki T; Kawachi K; Morita R; Kawata T; Mizuguchi K; Kobayashi S; Fukutomi M; Nishii T; Kobayashi H Circulation; 1988 Sep; 78(3 Pt 2):I129-39. PubMed ID: 3261649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. Loop FD; Lytle BW; Cosgrove DM; Stewart RW; Goormastic M; Williams GW; Golding LA; Gill CC; Taylor PC; Sheldon WC N Engl J Med; 1986 Jan; 314(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 3484393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coronary artery grafting with the saphenous vein or internal mammary artery. Comparison of late results in two consecutive series of patients. Grondin CM; Lespérance J; Bourassa MG; Campeau L Ann Thorac Surg; 1975 Dec; 20(6):605-18. PubMed ID: 1082314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]