474 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17997344)
1. Manual physical assessment of spinal segmental motion: intent and validity.
Abbott JH; Flynn TW; Fritz JM; Hing WA; Reid D; Whitman JM
Man Ther; 2009 Feb; 14(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 17997344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptions and use of passive intervertebral motion assessment of the spine: a survey among physiotherapists specializing in manual therapy.
van Trijffel E; Oostendorp RA; Lindeboom R; Bossuyt PM; Lucas C
Man Ther; 2009 Jun; 14(3):243-51. PubMed ID: 18387332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intertester reliability and validity of motion assessments during lumbar spine accessory motion testing.
Landel R; Kulig K; Fredericson M; Li B; Powers CM
Phys Ther; 2008 Jan; 88(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 18029394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lumbar spine segmental mobility assessment: an examination of validity for determining intervention strategies in patients with low back pain.
Fritz JM; Whitman JM; Childs JD
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 86(9):1745-52. PubMed ID: 16181937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The validity of manual examination in assessing patients with neck pain.
King W; Lau P; Lees R; Bogduk N
Spine J; 2007; 7(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 17197328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lumbar segmental instability: a criterion-related validity study of manual therapy assessment.
Abbott JH; McCane B; Herbison P; Moginie G; Chapple C; Hogarty T
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2005 Nov; 6():56. PubMed ID: 16274487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter-examiner reliability in assessing passive intervertebral motion of the cervical spine.
Smedmark V; Wallin M; Arvidsson I
Man Ther; 2000 May; 5(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 10903585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Reliability of manual medical examination techniques of the cervical spine. Study of quality assurance in manual diagnosis].
Schöps P; Pfingsten M; Siebert U
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2000; 138(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 10730356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interrater reliability of a passive physiological intervertebral motion test in the mid-thoracic spine.
Brismée JM; Gipson D; Ivie D; Lopez A; Moore M; Matthijs O; Phelps V; Sawyer S; Sizer P
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Jun; 29(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 16762664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The kinematics and intra- and inter-therapist consistencies of lower cervical rotational manipulation.
Ngan JM; Chow DH; Holmes AD
Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jun; 27(5):395-401. PubMed ID: 15863348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Manual forces applied during cervical mobilization.
Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA; Robertson VJ
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007 Jan; 30(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17224351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physical therapist attitude and opinion about cervical spine examination: A national Spanish survey.
Valera-Calero JA; Guodemar-Pérez J; Cleland JA; Ojedo-Martín C; Gallego-Sendarrubias GM
Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Mar; 75(3):e13781. PubMed ID: 33091196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effects of Maitland's manual mobilization on the thoracic spine].
Kessler TJ; Brunner F; Künzer S; Crippa M; Kissling R
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2005 Dec; 44(6):361-6. PubMed ID: 16320180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic response of the cervical spine to posteroanterior mobilisation.
Lee RY; McGregor AH; Bull AM; Wragg P
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Feb; 20(2):228-31. PubMed ID: 15621330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identifiers suggestive of clinical cervical spine instability: a Delphi study of physical therapists.
Cook C; Brismée JM; Fleming R; Sizer PS
Phys Ther; 2005 Sep; 85(9):895-906. PubMed ID: 16117600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subjective and objective descriptors of clinical lumbar spine instability: a Delphi study.
Cook C; Brismée JM; Sizer PS
Man Ther; 2006 Feb; 11(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 15996889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Motion palpation used as a postmanipulation assessment tool for monitoring end-feel improvement: a randomized controlled trial of test responsiveness.
Lakhani E; Nook B; Haas M; Docrat A
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2009 Sep; 32(7):549-55. PubMed ID: 19748406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodological quality and outcomes of studies addressing manual cervical spine examinations: a review.
Hollerwöger D
Man Ther; 2006 May; 11(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 16483829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring the posteroanterior stiffness of the cervical spine.
Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA; Robertson VJ
Man Ther; 2008 Dec; 13(6):520-8. PubMed ID: 17910931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical assessments of lumbar spinal function. How low back pain sufferers differ from normals. Implications for outcome measures research. Part I: kinematic assessments of lumbar function.
Lehman GJ
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 Jan; 27(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 14739876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
