584 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17997433)
1. Is a positive bladder neck margin truly a T4 lesion in the prostate specific antigen era? Results from the SEARCH Database.
Buschemeyer WC; Hamilton RJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):124-9; discussion 129. PubMed ID: 17997433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression.
Aydin H; Tsuzuki T; Hernandez D; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):551-5. PubMed ID: 15351591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PSA in the new millennium: a powerful predictor of prostate cancer prognosis and radical prostatectomy outcomes--results from the SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Hotaling JM; Fitzsimons NJ; Presti JC; Kane CJ; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Amling CL
Eur Urol; 2008 Apr; 53(4):758-64; discussion 765-6. PubMed ID: 17868976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical and pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with a preoperative Gleason sum of 8 to 10.
Bastian PJ; Gonzalgo ML; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Presti JC; Mangold LA; Humphreys E; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Freedland SJ
Cancer; 2006 Sep; 107(6):1265-72. PubMed ID: 16900523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathological outcomes and biochemical progression in men with T1c prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy with prostate specific antigen 2.6 to 4.0 vs 4.1 to 6.0 ng/ml.
Makarov DV; Humphreys EB; Mangold LA; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):554-8. PubMed ID: 16813888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Natural history of persistently elevated prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database.
Moreira DM; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2250-5. PubMed ID: 19758614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictors of prostate-specific antigen progression among men with seminal vesicle invasion at the time of radical prostatectomy.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Amling CL; Terris MK; Trock B; Kane CJ
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 100(8):1633-8. PubMed ID: 15073850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Dorey F; Amling CL;
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Percent tumor involvement and risk of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Rampersaud EN; Sun L; Moul JW; Madden J; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):571-6; discussion 576. PubMed ID: 18554662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression.
Sofer M; Hamilton-Nelson KL; Civantos F; Soloway MS
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2453-6. PubMed ID: 11992056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The significance of a positive bladder neck margin after radical prostatectomy: the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Stage T4 designation is not warranted.
Pierorazio PM; Epstein JI; Humphreys E; Han M; Walsh PC; Partin AW
J Urol; 2010 Jan; 183(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 19914651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bladder neck invasion is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence.
Poulos CK; Koch MO; Eble JN; Daggy JK; Cheng L
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 101(7):1563-8. PubMed ID: 15378493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adverse prognostic significance of capsular incision with radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shuford MD; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Shintani AK; Tsiatis A; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 15201750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Martin SK; Amling CL; Zincke H
Urology; 1997 Nov; 50(5):733-9. PubMed ID: 9372884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized, high risk prostate cancer: critical analysis of risk assessment methods.
Yossepowitch O; Eggener SE; Bianco FJ; Carver BS; Serio A; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):493-9; discussion 499. PubMed ID: 17561152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is biopsy Gleason score independently associated with biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy after adjusting for pathological Gleason score?
Fitzsimons NJ; Presti JC; Kane CJ; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2453-8; discussion 2458. PubMed ID: 17085127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era.
Boorjian SA; Thompson RH; Siddiqui S; Bagniewski S; Bergstralh EJ; Karnes RJ; Frank I; Blute ML
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):864-70; discussion 870-1. PubMed ID: 17631342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
