These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17997668)

  • 1. Bimodal sensory discrimination is finer than dual single modality discrimination.
    Koene A; Arnold D; Johnston A
    J Vis; 2007 Aug; 7(11):14.1-11. PubMed ID: 17997668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subthreshold noise facilitates the detection and discrimination of visual signals.
    Sasaki H; Sakane S; Ishida T; Todorokihara M; Kitamura T; Aoki R
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 May; 436(2):255-8. PubMed ID: 18400398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention.
    Helbig HB; Ernst MO
    J Vis; 2008 Jan; 8(1):21.1-16. PubMed ID: 18318624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modality-specificity of sensory aging in vision and audition: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Ceponiene R; Westerfield M; Torki M; Townsend J
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():53-68. PubMed ID: 18482717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning to integrate arbitrary signals from vision and touch.
    Ernst MO
    J Vis; 2007 Jun; 7(5):7.1-14. PubMed ID: 18217847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What is the signal in noise?
    Levi DM; Klein SA; Chen I
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1835-46. PubMed ID: 15797773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrimination of natural scenes in central and peripheral vision.
    To MP; Gilchrist ID; Troscianko T; Tolhurst DJ
    Vision Res; 2011 Jul; 51(14):1686-98. PubMed ID: 21640747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discriminating depth in corrugated stereo surfaces: facilitation by a pedestal is explained by removal of uncertainty.
    Georgeson MA; Yates TA; Schofield AJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2321-8. PubMed ID: 18682260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of notched noise on flicker detection and discrimination.
    Smithson HE; Henning GB; MacLeod DI; Stockman A
    J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):21.1-18. PubMed ID: 19757899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection in fixed and random noise in foveal and parafoveal vision explained by template learning.
    Beard BL; Ahumada AJ
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1999 Mar; 16(3):755-63. PubMed ID: 10069061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vision merges with touch in a purely tactile discrimination.
    Arabzadeh E; Clifford CW; Harris JA
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jul; 19(7):635-41. PubMed ID: 18727775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orientation discrimination in 5-year-olds and adults tested with luminance-modulated and contrast-modulated gratings.
    Lewis TL; Kingdon A; Ellemberg D; Maurer D
    J Vis; 2007 Mar; 7(4):9. PubMed ID: 17461693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial attention speeds discrimination without awareness in blindsight.
    Kentridge RW; Heywood CA; Weiskrantz L
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(6):831-5. PubMed ID: 15037061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The interplay between the auditory and visual modality for end-of-utterance detection.
    Barkhuysen P; Krahmer E; Swerts M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):354-65. PubMed ID: 18177165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The contribution of color to global motion processing.
    Michna ML; Mullen KT
    J Vis; 2008 May; 8(5):10.1-12. PubMed ID: 18842081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visually induced feelings of touch.
    Johnson RM; Burton PC; Ro T
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1073-1074():398-406. PubMed ID: 16455063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of attention on the illusory capture of motion in bimodal stimuli.
    Oruc I; Sinnett S; Bischof WF; Soto-Faraco S; Lock K; Kingstone A
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():200-8. PubMed ID: 18514172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal aspects of orientation pooling using visual noise stimuli.
    Anderson ND; Murphy KM; Jones DG
    J Vis; 2007 Jan; 7(1):9. PubMed ID: 17461677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peripheral vision: good for biological motion, bad for signal noise segregation?
    Thompson B; Hansen BC; Hess RF; Troje NF
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):12.1-7. PubMed ID: 17997681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.