These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17997670)

  • 1. Optimal observer model of single-fixation oddity search predicts a shallow set-size function.
    Schoonveld W; Shimozaki SS; Eckstein MP
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):1.1-16. PubMed ID: 17997670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A unified bayesian observer analysis for set size and cueing effects on perceptual decisions and saccades.
    Shimozaki SS; Schoonveld WA; Eckstein MP
    J Vis; 2012 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 22728676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal feature integration in visual search.
    Vincent BT; Baddeley RJ; Troscianko T; Gilchrist ID
    J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):15.1-11. PubMed ID: 19757893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The roles of distractor noise and target certainty in search: a signal detection model.
    Santhi N; Reeves A
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1235-56. PubMed ID: 15066389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Classification images for detection, contrast discrimination, and identification tasks with a common ideal observer.
    Abbey CK; Eckstein MP
    J Vis; 2006 Feb; 6(4):335-55. PubMed ID: 16889473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: a direct behavioral demonstration.
    Bricolo E; Gianesini T; Fanini A; Bundesen C; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):980-93. PubMed ID: 12419123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Set-size effects for identification versus localization depend on the visual search task.
    Busey T; Palmer J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):790-810. PubMed ID: 18665726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task demands determine the specificity of the search template.
    Bravo MJ; Farid H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):124-31. PubMed ID: 22006527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance in simple visual search at threshold contrasts.
    Laarni J; Näsänen R; Rovamo J; Saarinen J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jul; 37(8):1706-10. PubMed ID: 8675416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A feature-weighting account of priming in conjunction search.
    Becker SI; Horstmann G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):258-72. PubMed ID: 19304616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The roles of cortical image separation and size in active visual search performance.
    Motter BC; Simoni DA
    J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(2):6.1-15. PubMed ID: 18217821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonspatial interdimensional attentional capture.
    Inukai T; Kawahara J; Kumada T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):658-66. PubMed ID: 20348572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.
    VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual search deficits in Parkinson's disease are attenuated by bottom-up target salience and top-down information.
    Horowitz TS; Choi WY; Horvitz JC; Côté LJ; Mangels JA
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1962-77. PubMed ID: 16580700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A bottom-up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition.
    Einhäuser W; Mundhenk TN; Baldi P; Koch C; Itti L
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):6.1-13. PubMed ID: 17997675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Odd-item search in pigeons: display size and transfer effects.
    Blough DS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Jan; 15(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 2926332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining subprocesses of visual feature search with reaction time models.
    Müller-Plath G; Pollmann S
    Psychol Res; 2003 May; 67(2):80-105. PubMed ID: 12739145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sources of top-down control in visual search.
    Weidner R; Krummenacher J; Reimann B; Müller HJ; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2100-13. PubMed ID: 19199412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.