BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17997675)

  • 1. A bottom-up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition.
    Einhäuser W; Mundhenk TN; Baldi P; Koch C; Itti L
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):6.1-13. PubMed ID: 17997675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays.
    Pomplun M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1886-900. PubMed ID: 16445960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The spatial distribution of visual attention.
    Gobell JL; Tseng CH; Sperling G
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1273-96. PubMed ID: 15066391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociation of stimulus relevance and saliency factors during shifts of visuospatial attention.
    Indovina I; Macaluso E
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Jul; 17(7):1701-11. PubMed ID: 17003078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The spatial window of the perceptual template and endogenous attention.
    Dosher BA; Liu SH; Blair N; Lu ZL
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1257-71. PubMed ID: 15066390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retinotopic sensitisation to spatial scale: evidence for flexible spatial frequency processing in scene perception.
    Ozgen E; Payne HE; Sowden PT; Schyns PG
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):1108-19. PubMed ID: 16146638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interference from filled delays on visual change detection.
    Makovski T; Shim WM; Jiang YV
    J Vis; 2006 Dec; 6(12):1459-70. PubMed ID: 17209748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The neural basis of perceptual hypothesis generation and testing.
    Weidner R; Shah NJ; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 16494685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters.
    Lee DK; Itti L; Koch C; Braun J
    Nat Neurosci; 1999 Apr; 2(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 10204546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The temporal dynamics of selective attention of the visual periphery as measured by classification images.
    Shimozaki SS; Chen KY; Abbey CK; Eckstein MP
    J Vis; 2007 Sep; 7(12):10.1-20. PubMed ID: 17997652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
    Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Top-down attention selection is fine grained.
    Navalpakkam V; Itti L
    J Vis; 2006 Oct; 6(11):1180-93. PubMed ID: 17209728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays.
    Smith PL; Ratcliff R; Wolfgang BJ
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1297-320. PubMed ID: 15066392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Focal distraction: spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture.
    Ghorashi SM; Zuvic SM; Visser TA; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 12669749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional states and the degree of visual adaptation to gratings.
    Festman Y; Ahissar M
    Neural Netw; 2004; 17(5-6):849-60. PubMed ID: 15288902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting visual fixations on video based on low-level visual features.
    Le Meur O; Le Callet P; Barba D
    Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(19):2483-98. PubMed ID: 17688904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task-set reconfiguration suspends perceptual processing: evidence from semantic priming during the attentional blink.
    Vachon F; Tremblay S; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):330-47. PubMed ID: 17469971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of multidimensional targets in visual search.
    Monnier P
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(24):4083-90. PubMed ID: 17007899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.