These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17998076)

  • 1. The impact of trial baseline imbalances should be considered in systematic reviews: a methodological case study.
    Trowman R; Dumville JC; Torgerson DJ; Cranny G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1229-33. PubMed ID: 17998076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the impact of attrition in randomized controlled trials.
    Hewitt CE; Kumaravel B; Dumville JC; Torgerson DJ;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1264-70. PubMed ID: 20573482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A methodological review of recent meta-analyses has found significant heterogeneity in age between randomized groups.
    Clark L; Fairhurst C; Hewitt CE; Birks Y; Brabyn S; Cockayne S; Rodgers S; Hicks K; Hodgson R; Littlewood E; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 67(9):1016-24. PubMed ID: 24909873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Important outcome predictors showed greater baseline heterogeneity than age in two systematic reviews.
    Clark L; Fairhurst C; Cook E; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 25457029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes on pooled effect estimates in systematic reviews: a protocol for a methodological study.
    Akl EA; Kahale LA; Agarwal A; Al-Matari N; Ebrahim S; Alexander PE; Briel M; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Diab B; Iorio A; Kwong J; Li L; Lopes LC; Mustafa R; Neumann I; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt G
    Syst Rev; 2014 Nov; 3():137. PubMed ID: 25423894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic reviews of randomised clinical trials examining the effects of psychotherapeutic interventions versus "no intervention" for acute major depressive disorder and a randomised trial examining the effects of "third wave" cognitive therapy versus mentalization-based treatment for acute major depressive disorder.
    Jakobsen JC
    Dan Med J; 2014 Oct; 61(10):B4942. PubMed ID: 25283628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
    Tierney JF; Stewart LA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls.
    da Costa BR; Juni P
    Eur Heart J; 2014 Dec; 35(47):3336-45. PubMed ID: 25416325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Challenges of Prolonged Follow-up and Temporal Imbalance in Pragmatic Trials: Analysis of the ENCOURAGE Trial.
    Richman JS; Andreae S; Safford MM
    Ann Fam Med; 2015 Aug; 13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S66-72. PubMed ID: 26304974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Atakpo P; Vassar M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2016 May; 82(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 26925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The reverse propensity score to detect selection bias and correct for baseline imbalances.
    Berger VW
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2777-87. PubMed ID: 15981305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of numbers needed to treat derived from systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Caveats and pitfalls.
    Ebrahim S
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Jun; 24(2):152-64. PubMed ID: 11523384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analysis of randomised trials with a continuous outcome according to baseline imbalance and availability of individual participant data.
    Riley RD; Kauser I; Bland M; Thijs L; Staessen JA; Wang J; Gueyffier F; Deeks JJ
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2747-66. PubMed ID: 23303608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses.
    Hart B; Lundh A; Bero L
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7202. PubMed ID: 22214754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the criteria used for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing adverse effects.
    Bonovas S; Lytras T; Nikolopoulos G
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 30(3):249-50. PubMed ID: 25773753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic reviews: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
    Yuan Y; Hunt RH
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 May; 104(5):1086-92. PubMed ID: 19417748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.