117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17998079)
1. Mixed-mode administration reduced bias and enhanced poststratification adjustments in a health behavior survey.
Baines AD; Partin MR; Davern M; Rockwood TH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1246-55. PubMed ID: 17998079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adjustments for non-telephone bias in random-digit-dialling surveys.
Frankel MR; Srinath KP; Hoaglin DC; Battaglia MP; Smith PJ; Wright RA; Khare M
Stat Med; 2003 May; 22(9):1611-26. PubMed ID: 12704619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
Westrick SC; Mount JK
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective comparison of endoscopy patient satisfaction surveys: e-mail versus standard mail versus telephone.
Harewood GC; Yacavone RF; Locke GR; Wiersema MJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Dec; 96(12):3312-7. PubMed ID: 11774942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No increase in response rate by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: a randomized trial.
Brøgger J; Nystad W; Cappelen I; Bakke P
J Med Internet Res; 2007 Dec; 9(5):e40. PubMed ID: 18174120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of self-reported colorectal cancer screening behavior from a mixed-mode survey of veterans.
Partin MR; Grill J; Noorbaloochi S; Powell AA; Burgess DJ; Vernon SW; Halek K; Griffin JM; van Ryn M; Fisher DA
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Apr; 17(4):768-76. PubMed ID: 18381474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phone respondents reported less mental health problems whereas mail interviewee gave higher physical health ratings.
Ravens-Sieberer U; Erhart M; Wetzel R; Krügel A; Brambosch A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):1056-60. PubMed ID: 18538990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Telephone vs. mail survey gives different SF-36 quality-of-life scores among cancer survivors.
Buskirk TD; Stein KD
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):1049-55. PubMed ID: 18538997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonresponse bias in a mail survey of physicians.
McFarlane E; Olmsted MG; Murphy J; Hill CA
Eval Health Prof; 2007 Jun; 30(2):170-85. PubMed ID: 17476029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonresponse bias and cost-effectiveness in a Norwegian survey of family physicians.
Bjertnaes OA; Garratt A; Botten G
Eval Health Prof; 2008 Mar; 31(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 18174607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electronic mail was not better than postal mail for surveying residents and faculty.
Akl EA; Maroun N; Klocke RA; Montori V; Schünemann HJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 58(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 15862729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Population coverage and nonresponse bias in a large-scale human exposure study.
Mosquin P; Whitmore R; Suerken C; Quackenboss J
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 15(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 15674317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimum survey methods when interviewing employed women.
Dunning K; LeMasters GK
Am J Ind Med; 2009 Feb; 52(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 19016248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does mode matter? A comparison of telephone, mail, and in-person treatments in contingent valuation surveys.
Maguire KB
J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3528-33. PubMed ID: 19647362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of mail and telephone in assessing patient experiences in receiving care from medical group practices.
Hepner KA; Brown JA; Hays RD
Eval Health Prof; 2005 Dec; 28(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 16272420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bias in telephone surveys that do not sample cell phones: uses and limits of poststratification adjustments.
Call KT; Davern M; Boudreaux M; Johnson PJ; Nelson J
Med Care; 2011 Apr; 49(4):355-64. PubMed ID: 21407032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences between RDD telephone and ABS mail survey design: coverage, unit nonresponse, and measurement error.
Peytchev A; Ridenhour J; Krotki K
J Health Commun; 2010; 15 Suppl 3():117-34. PubMed ID: 21154088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the effectiveness of a single telephone contact as an adjunct to a self-help intervention for smoking cessation in a randomized controlled trial.
Míguez MC; Becoña E
Nicotine Tob Res; 2008 Jan; 10(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 18188753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prolonged recruitment efforts in health surveys: effects on response, costs, and potential bias.
Holle R; Hochadel M; Reitmeir P; Meisinger C; Wichmann HE;
Epidemiology; 2006 Nov; 17(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 17003684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Balancing quality and cost for Adult Tobacco Telephone Surveys.
Fernandez BM; Hannah KM; Wallack RS; Hicks JK; Gorrigan AM; Mariolis P
Am J Health Behav; 2007; 31(3):284-96. PubMed ID: 17402868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
