135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17998087)
1. Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate.
Byrne CM; Harrison JD; Young JM; Selby WS; Solomon MJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1312-4. PubMed ID: 17998087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postal surveys of physicians gave superior response rates over telephone interviews in a randomized trial.
Hocking JS; Lim MS; Read T; Hellard M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 May; 59(5):521-4. PubMed ID: 16632141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Introductory postcards: do they increase response rate in a telephone survey of older persons?
Iredell H; Shaw T; Howat P; James R; Granich J
Health Educ Res; 2004 Apr; 19(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 15031275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outpatient satisfaction: validation of a French-language questionnaire: data quality and identification of associated factors.
Labarère J; François P; Bertrand D; Peyrin JC; Robert C; Fourny M
Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1999; 7(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 10747567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increasing response to a postal survey of sedentary patients - a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN45665423].
Harrison RA; Cock D
BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):31. PubMed ID: 15537429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Including questionnaires with the invitation package appeared to increase the response fraction among women.
Rogers PA; Haddow L; Thomson AK; Fritschi L; Girschik J; Boyle T; El Zaemey S; Heyworth JS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 65(6):696-9. PubMed ID: 22424608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Format and readability of an enhanced invitation letter did not affect participation rates in a cancer registry-based study: a randomized controlled trial.
Hall AE; Sanson-Fisher RW; Lynagh MC; Threlfall T; D'Este CA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 23102853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Barriers to adherence to preventive services reminder letters: the patient's perspective.
Ornstein SM; Musham C; Reid A; Jenkins RG; Zemp LD; Garr DR
J Fam Pract; 1993 Feb; 36(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 8426139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Telephone reminders are effective in recruiting nonresponding patients to randomized controlled trials.
Nystuen P; Hagen KB
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 57(8):773-6. PubMed ID: 15485728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility of Web-based assessment of patient satisfaction with endoscopy.
Harewood GC; Wiersema MJ; de Groen PC
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 May; 98(5):1016-21. PubMed ID: 12809822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lottery incentives did not improve response rate to a mailed survey: a randomized controlled trial.
Harris IA; Khoo OK; Young JM; Solomon MJ; Rae H
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):609-10. PubMed ID: 18471665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mailing strategies and recruitment into an intervention trial of the exercise effect on breast cancer biomarkers.
Tworoger SS; Yasui Y; Ulrich CM; Nakamura H; LaCroix K; Johnston R; McTiernan A
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Jan; 11(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 11815403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The consent and prescription compliance (COPRECO) study: does obtaining consent in the emergency department affect study results in a telephone follow-up study of medication compliance?
Campbell SG; McCarvill EM; Magee KD; Cajee I; Crawford M
Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Oct; 15(10):932-8. PubMed ID: 18811636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using different approaches to conducting postal questionnaires affected response rates and cost-efficiency.
Stenhammar C; Bokström P; Edlund B; Sarkadi A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1137-43. PubMed ID: 21524566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Questionnaire order significantly increased response to a postal survey sent to primary care physicians.
Drummond FJ; Sharp L; Carsin AE; Kelleher T; Comber H
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 18177791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Response to mail surveys: effect of a request to explain refusal to participate. The ARIC Study Investigators.
Shahar E; Bisgard KM; Folsom AR
Epidemiology; 1993 Sep; 4(5):480-2. PubMed ID: 8399698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of advance telephone prompting in a survey of general dental practitioners in scotland: a randomised controlled trial.
Ho-A-Yun J; Crawford F; Newton J; Clarkson J
Community Dent Health; 2007 Dec; 24(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 18246841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient satisfaction with receiving skin cancer diagnosis by letter: comparison with face-to-face consultation.
Karri V; Bragg TW; Jones A; Soldin M; Misch K
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Aug; 62(8):1059-62. PubMed ID: 18485851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Initial nonresponders had an increased response rate after repeated questionnaire mailings.
Wensing M; Schattenberg G
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):959-61. PubMed ID: 16085200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of letters sent to patients after difficult airway management.
Trentman TL; Frasco PE; Milde LN
J Clin Anesth; 2004 Jun; 16(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 15261315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
